Jessica R. Brown Runs for Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas
"Quite simply, improving our justice system makes Philadelphia better for everyone. Being a judge would be the ultimate way I could live up to the values my parents taught me and give something back to the place I love so much."
April 05, 2023 at 11:25 AM
6 minute read
Candidate: Jessica R. Brown
Court: Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas
Party: Democrat
Philadelphia Bar Association rating: Recommended
Ballot position: 13
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal Intelligencer: Tell us about your background, where you went to law school, what firms you have practiced at, and areas of law you focus on.
Brown: Bates College, September 1994 through May 1998, B.A.; Temple University Beasley School of Law, September 1998 through May 2001, J.D.; Defender Association of Philadelphia, September 2001 to September 2007; Office of the Solicitor of Labor, Region III, U.S. Dept. of Labor, September 2007 to June 2018; Willig, Williams & Davidson, June 2018 to date.
My work has always consisted of litigation or similar-type work (such as arbitration). I currently work exclusively in the civil arena, representing labor unions and individual clients. Before that, I worked for 10½ years with the U.S. Department of Labor in its Solicitor's Office, representing the government in civil enforcement litigation. I started my career at the Defender Association of Philadelphia as a trial attorney, practicing exclusively criminal law. While at the Defender Association, I appeared in both municipal and common pleas court, handling thousands of cases. Additionally, I spent my last two years as a member of the Juvenile Special Defense Unit, representing children charged as adults and handling other high-profile juvenile matters. My career has always been one of advocacy through court or court-like proceedings. My current practice is almost exclusively labor and employment law with some ERISA and FLSA litigation.
The Legal: What is one major thing about your career experience that most qualifies you for this position, and why?
Brown: I have a long and varied professional background in multiple areas of law and representing differing parties. I have represented individuals, the government and unions. I have practiced civil and criminal law. I have appeared in federal and state trial courts, as well as in front of administrative bodies. I have chosen three times to completely change the area of law that I practice. All of this makes me uniquely qualified to address the many different people and issues that can arise in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. I would improve our justice system simply by being respectful and by being a jurist who listens and is willing to learn. Each matter in court is the most important case to those parties. It is important that a judge listens, is willing to learn and is respectful in all cases. I can, and will, do this. By so doing, I will improve our system of justice.
The Legal: What is the main reason Pennsylvania voters should pick you?
Brown: I have lived in and around Philadelphia for my entire life. I was born in Bridesburg and spent much of my childhood swimming at my neighborhood recreation center pool. I love this city. I love its sports teams, having spent every Sunday growing up watching the Eagles with my dad and learning how to keep the score at Phillies games with my mom. I love its quirks—from watching the "Chicken Man" eat his 40th rotisserie chicken to knowing summer has begun because there is a picture of Ed Rendell jumping into a city pool. I even love the things about it that frustrate me endlessly, such as the lack of open public restrooms in SEPTA stations.
My family is in many ways the embodiment of the American dream. My grandparents did not graduate from high school and worked hard their whole lives at jobs they did not love to raise their families. My mother did not just graduate from high school but also went to college. She became a proud public school teacher. My father took advantage of the technical school at his high school and was able to get a job as a lab technician at Rohm and Haas. He worked there until retirement. Together they raised four children, of which I am the oldest. My parents stressed how fortunate our family was and how with that came a duty to make our community better than we found it.
I went to law school with that in mind. I became a public defender because I wanted to help our justice system reflect its ideals. I moved to the Department of Labor because I wanted to continue in public service, just in a different way, this time to enforce the law to improve the lives of workers. Finally, I joined Willig Williams because I was frustrated by the limitations of the law and federal enforcement. I decided aiding unions would be a more impactful way to help workers.
I want to be a judge for the same reasons I went to law school and took all my legal jobs. That is, I want to make our community better. Quite simply, improving our justice system makes Philadelphia better for everyone. Being a judge would be the ultimate way I could live up to the values my parents taught me and give something back to the place I love so much.
The Legal: What will be your approach to moving matters efficiently through the case management system?
Brown: The First Judicial District is a large entity. The case management system changes as needed—economic crisis, COVID-19, etc. In any assignment, I will be prompt, consistent, hardworking, respectful to staff and attorneys, thoughtful about my use of technology and communication, and knowledgeable about the resources at my disposal. This judicial strategy will encourage transparency and fair negotiations among the parties, ease of scheduling, and the disposition of a higher number of cases than in rooms with unpredictable or unreasonable judges.
The Legal: What would you say to voters regarding your plans to ensure the equal administration of justice for all people?
Brown: I have a varied background in multiple areas of law and representing differing parties. I have represented individuals, the government and unions. I have practiced civil and criminal law. I have appeared in federal and state trial courts, as well as in front of administrative bodies. I am uniquely qualified to address the many different people and issues that can arise in the Court of Common Pleas.
My judicial philosophy is to treat everyone in my courtroom with respect. I will examine each case from a neutral posture, consider the facts and law, and apply those facts to the law. As a trial judge, I would follow all relevant appellate precedents in reaching my conclusion. A trial judge must be sensitive to the individual circumstances of every defendant, complaining witness or plaintiff, but it is also important to be consistent and evenhanded. I believe that this is best accomplished by electing judges, like myself, who have lived in the city for a significant period of time, have practiced law in a variety of settings with different types of clients, and have tried cases in different jurisdictions. My experience as a lawyer can guide my actions as a trial judge.
The Legal: Where can voters go for more information about you?
Brown: https://www.jessbrown4judge.com/
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSuperior Court Directs Western Pa. Judge to Recuse From Case Over Business Ties to Defendant
3 minute readSaxton & Stump Lands Newly Retired Ex-Chief Judge From Middle District of Pa.
3 minute read'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
3 minute readJudge Louis C. Bechtle: An American Jurist Who Relied on Common Sense, Sound Judgment and Fairness
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Doug Emhoff, Husband of Former VP Harris, Lands at Willkie
- 2LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 3Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 4Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 5The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250