Fredda Maddox Runs for Chester County Court of Common Pleas
My broad experience as an attorney for 25 years and as the elected Sheriff of Chester County gives me a balanced perspective of the judicial system.
April 14, 2023 at 12:05 PM
5 minute read
Candidate: Fredda Maddox
Court: Chester County Court of Common Pleas
Party: Democrat and Republican
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal Intelligencer: Tell us about your background, where you went to law school, what firms you have practiced at, and areas of law you focus on.
Fredda Maddox: No candidate offers such a deep and diverse background. My foundation began with making my first traffic arrest as a PA State Trooper where I dealt not just with traffic and DUI offenses but, as a narcotics agent, investigated criminal organizations. Later, I attended Widener Law School in the evening while maintaining full law enforcement responsibilities as an adult student. I learned the internal workings, daily operations and drafted legal opinions for the court as a law clerk for the Honorable M. Teresa Sarmina in Philadelphia.
My legal experience includes being a former Philadelphia public defender, court-appointed child advocate attorney, staff attorney with the Domestic Violence Center of Chester County and and an associate attorney with Rovito Law LLC, a family law practice. Elected Chester County sheriff in 2019, I am charged with protecting protecting the courts.
The Legal: What is one major thing about your career experience that most qualifies you for this position, and why?
Maddox: I bring non-traditional practical legal experience in addition to having practiced law for 25 years that is unparalleled to any judicial candidate in Chester County. As the elected sheriff of Chester County and law enforcement veteran, I have protected the community as a former PA state trooper and a narcotics agent with the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General and have had to make tough and at times unpopular decisions, abide by the rule of law while showing compassion without being swayed by emotion or public opinion. The daily interactions with members of the community, providing emergency assistance has equipped me with the patience, listening skills and the ability to make credibility determinations which provide a solid foundation to serve as a judge to administer fairness, and justice for all.
The Legal: What is the main reason Pennsylvania voters should pick you?
Maddox: I bring a rare combination of legal and law enforcement experience to the bench that will result in the safety, fairness and justice for all. My broad experience as an attorney for 25 years and as the elected sheriff of Chester County gives me a balanced perspective of the judicial system. I have a lifetime of service and protection of the community with a distinguished law enforcement career. Coupled with that is my legal background as a former public defender, assistant county solicitor, child advocate attorney, attorney advocate for survivors of domestic violence and human trafficking and associate attorney with a private family law practice. Having represented the accused and the accuser, the abused and the abuser, the privileged and the poor equally, I understand how families, and community members are impacted by our justice system. This culmination of experience gives me a deep respect for the great people and institutions that work collectively to protect all of us equally under the law.
The Legal: What will be your approach to moving matters efficiently through the case management system?
Maddox: The use of technology and the creation of the case management system has been an invaluable tool to the courts and helps streamline processes and tracks cases. Unfortunately, many of us have seen what occurs when technological systems malfunction. Technology cannot replace clear communication and standardized courtroom procedures. Setting the expectations of the court, delineating roles and responsibilities, establishing clear deadlines and procedures with personnel and attorneys appearing before the court, should ensure that cases move efficiently. Clear and concise communication at the outset should reduce misunderstandings and delays in the process. Litigants are entitled to a speedy trial, and unnecessary court delays and emergency situations arise and may require matters be continued; however, the use of continuances should be the exception and not the norm nor a substitute for unpreparedness.
The Legal: What would you say to voters regarding your plans to ensure the equal administration of justice for all people?
Maddox: I have seen law enforcement, the law and courts from a variety of perspectives. One thing that remains common across all those experiences is the sanctity of the law and the need to preserve constitutional norms—the right of the accused to a fair trial; the rights of all parties to have grievances heard and adjudicated based on the evidence and the law. All parties, and this includes prosecutors, defense attorneys, defendants, plaintiffs, witnesses and court staff, deserve to be respected by the bench. My goal as both a judge and a human being, would be for all who come before me to leave feeling they were treated with respect and fairness, no matter the outcome of an individual case.
The Legal: Where can voters go for more information about you?
Maddox: Like us on Facebook and Instagram at MaddoxforJudge.com or at www.maddoxforjudge.com
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudicial Appointments After Casey: Observers Wary but Hopeful Bipartisan Spirit Will Continue
Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Conference Declines Democratic Request to Refer Justice Thomas to DOJ
- 2People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 3Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 4Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 5Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250