Bryan Neft Runs for the Commonwealth Court
My experience practicing law and my record of hard work to improve the profession of law and the judiciary are unparalleled. My work handling complex legal matters will allow me to handle the complex litigation that Commonwealth Court is known for.
April 17, 2023 at 12:39 PM
5 minute read
JudgesCandidate: Bryan Neft
Court: Commonwealth Court
Party: Democrat
Pennsylvania Bar Association Rating: Recommended
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal Intelligencer: Tell us about your background, where you went to law school, what firms you have practiced at, and areas of law you focus on.
Bryan Neft: I was born and raised in Pittsburgh. My father was a small businessman and my mother was a lawyer who started her career as a home economics teacher. I received a Bachelors of Arts degree in Political Science from the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia and a law degree from Boston University School of Law. Presently, I live in Pittsburgh's South Hills with my wife, Julie Cohen, an author, two of our three children and our rescue German Shepherd, Elsa.
I have spent more than 30 years litigating and trying cases, and counseling clients throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and California. I began my career as a clerk for the Pennsylvania Superior Court where I learned the essentials of judicial review. I have practiced before all three state appellate courts, the West Virginia Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. I have practiced in approximately 30 counties across Pennsylvania and in each of the Pennsylvania appellate courts including the Commonwealth Court, the court to which I am seeking election.
The firms in which I have practiced include Spilman Thomas & Battle PLLC; Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti; Klett Rooney Lieber & Schorling; and Frankovitch Anetakis Colantonio & Simon.
My practice has covered a wide variety of areas including commercial litigation, insurance law and insurance bad faith, federal qui tam, health care, land use, antitrust and product Liability.
The Legal: What is one major thing about your career experience that most qualifies you for this position, and why?
Neft: I bring 33 years of experience as a trial lawyer to this position. I served as a law clerk for four years and, during the remainder of my time in private practice, I have handled a wide variety of cases including many of the kind that the Commonwealth Court hears. I have represented school districts and state agencies before the Commonwealth Court on issues of sovereign immunity. I have also handled matters involving insureds in insurance liquidation proceedings. I have also handled land use and zoning matters before the court.
The one thing that stands out about my career is that I have worked on complex commercial disputes that prepare me well for the types of complex cases that come before the Commonwealth Court.
The Legal: What is the main reason Pennsylvania voters should pick you?
Neft: My experience practicing law and my record of hard work to improve the profession of law and the judiciary are unparalleled. My work handling complex legal matters will allow me to handle the complex litigation that Commonwealth Court is known for.
In addition, I have traversed Pennsylvania for the past two and one half years learning about the kitchen table concerns of Pennsylvanians in every corner of our commonwealth. My building relationships across the state, coupled with my decades of legal and community service both regionally and throughout Pennsylvania, is the foundation of my trajectory to win in November. I believe my path to victory runs through every Pennsylvania county, not just a few—that is why I have visited over 40 counties since last summer and am on track to visit all of Pennsylvania's 67 counties.
The Legal: What will be your approach to moving matters efficiently through the case management system?
Neft: Commonwealth Court has both a trial court jurisdiction and an appellate jurisdiction. The key to moving matters through the trial court system is to work with the parties to have realistic case management deadlines based on the type of case being brought and to hold the parties to those deadlines.
For the appellate cases that come before the court I would work hand in hand with my staff of clerks to ensure that cases are being considered timely and their resources are being used efficiently. Some cases on appeal will demand more focus and attention than others based on their complexity. And staffing of cases will be flexible to accommodate those cases that demand additional time and attention.
The Legal: What would you say to voters regarding your plans to ensure the equal administration of justice for all people?
Neft: First and foremost, every person or entity that comes to the Commonwealth Court is entitled to a full and fair opportunity to have their case heard. This axiom applies to all parties from the pro se litigant and individuals seeking redress of their claims, to government entities and large corporations.
I have also worked hard to expand access to justice—finding legal help for those who cannot afford it. I have done this by representing litigants pro bono, by developing pro bono legal clinics in Allegheny County and by serving as a member and chair of the Pennsylvania IOLTA board, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's board that oversees legal aid programs across the commonwealth. As a member of the Commonwealth Court, I commit to doing more to expand access to justice.
The Legal: Where can voters go for more information about you?
Neft: Voters can learn more about me at my website www.bryanneft.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA New State Law Is a Positive Step Forward for Judicial Security in Pennsylvania—But More Action Is Needed
5 minute readCommentary: Sen. Casey's Critical Role in Keeping Pa. Federal Courts Full
As Appointment Window Narrows, Vacancies on Phila. Court May Linger Until After Primaries
Federal Court Rejects City of Philadelphia's Request to Appoint New Judge in Related Case
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
- 2While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 3The Definition of Special Employment
- 4People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
- 5Rawle & Henderson Hires New Del. Managing Partner
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250