Andy Szefi Runs for Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas
As county solicitor for a decade, I was intimately involved in managing and defending our elections, an issue which is currently the greatest threat our democracy faces.
April 18, 2023 at 10:55 AM
4 minute read
Candidate: Andy Szefi
Court: Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas
Party: Democrat and Republican
Allegheny County Bar Association Rating: Highly Recommended
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal Intelligencer: Tell us about your background, where you went to law school, what firms you have practiced at, and areas of law you focus on.
Andy Szefi: I grew up in Mt. Lebanon and attended Mt. Lebanon High School. I attended University of Richmond on an academic scholarship and received my B.A. in 1994. I received my J.D. from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and then went into private practice at the law firm of Goehring, Rutter & Boehm for about 13 years, concentrating my practice in litigation, municipal law and real estate matters. In early 2012, I was appointed as Allegheny County solicitor and held that position for 10 years until I was appointed to the Court of Common Pleas in the summer of 2022.
The Legal: What is one major thing about your career experience that most qualifies you for this position, and why?
Szefi: As the only sitting judge in this race, I bring the unique perspective of having done the job. In addition, we have an acute and immediate need on the court for a judge to assume the docket previously handled by Judge Joseph James, the elections judge for the past 20-plus years. As county solicitor for a decade, I was intimately involved in managing and defending our elections, an issue which is currently the greatest threat our democracy faces. I am uniquely qualified to fill the role that our court needs most. We have no shortage of criminal defense lawyers in the criminal and family divisions, both important functions, but with only one seat to fill, it is vital that the critical needs facing the court be addressed.
The Legal: What is the main reason Pennsylvania voters should pick you?
Szefi: The diversity of my legal background and experience on the bench combine to make me the most-qualified candidate and, as discussed above, the one candidate who can fill the critical need our court faces. While I share the perspectives and support the efforts of our 10 recently elected judges who currently sit in the Criminal and Family Divisions, my current seat in the Civil Division must be filled with someone with the experience to handle the election docket, in addition to the breadth of matters filed in that division that affect all Allegheny County citizens.
The Legal: What will be your approach to moving matters efficiently through the case management system?
Szefi: The Court of Common Pleas has been trending in the direction of a truly assigned docket. I believe this trend should not only continue but be expedited. It will be a challenging task to be sure given the more than 15,000 matters filed in the Civil Division every year. The recently implemented mandatory mediation program is a great start and will aid in streamlining dockets, as will the continued growth of specialty courts within divisions. I support the continued expansion of those efforts. In addition, we must elect judges who are diligent and prepared. In short, judges who work. In my relatively short time on the bench I am confident that I have earned a reputation for being such a judge.
The Legal: What would you say to voters regarding your plans to ensure the equal administration of justice for all people?
Szefi: As a judge, it is my obligation to ensure that everyone receives equal treatment. Everyone. This starts with access. In the Civil Division, I sit on the Housing Court, where we maximize the use of remote proceedings to facilitate the participation of unrepresented parties. The use of such proceedings, particularly when dealing with unrepresented parties, must be utilized whenever possible. When appearing in court, people should see a court and staff that reflects the people it serves. I have made and continue to make every effort to maximize the applicant pools for the position I can fill to include groups historically underrepresented in our legal system. In addition, my staff and I engage in mandatory implicit bias education to ensure that we are always mindful of the biases that can and do affect everyone in our country.
The Legal: Where can voters go for more information about you?
Szefi: Go to www.andy4judge.com, any of our social media sites, or contact the campaign directly!
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSuperior Court Directs Western Pa. Judge to Recuse From Case Over Business Ties to Defendant
3 minute readSaxton & Stump Lands Newly Retired Ex-Chief Judge From Middle District of Pa.
3 minute read'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
3 minute readJudge Louis C. Bechtle: An American Jurist Who Relied on Common Sense, Sound Judgment and Fairness
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250