Andy Szefi Runs for Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas
As county solicitor for a decade, I was intimately involved in managing and defending our elections, an issue which is currently the greatest threat our democracy faces.
April 18, 2023 at 10:55 AM
4 minute read
JudgesCandidate: Andy Szefi
Court: Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas
Party: Democrat and Republican
Allegheny County Bar Association Rating: Highly Recommended
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal Intelligencer: Tell us about your background, where you went to law school, what firms you have practiced at, and areas of law you focus on.
Andy Szefi: I grew up in Mt. Lebanon and attended Mt. Lebanon High School. I attended University of Richmond on an academic scholarship and received my B.A. in 1994. I received my J.D. from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and then went into private practice at the law firm of Goehring, Rutter & Boehm for about 13 years, concentrating my practice in litigation, municipal law and real estate matters. In early 2012, I was appointed as Allegheny County solicitor and held that position for 10 years until I was appointed to the Court of Common Pleas in the summer of 2022.
The Legal: What is one major thing about your career experience that most qualifies you for this position, and why?
Szefi: As the only sitting judge in this race, I bring the unique perspective of having done the job. In addition, we have an acute and immediate need on the court for a judge to assume the docket previously handled by Judge Joseph James, the elections judge for the past 20-plus years. As county solicitor for a decade, I was intimately involved in managing and defending our elections, an issue which is currently the greatest threat our democracy faces. I am uniquely qualified to fill the role that our court needs most. We have no shortage of criminal defense lawyers in the criminal and family divisions, both important functions, but with only one seat to fill, it is vital that the critical needs facing the court be addressed.
The Legal: What is the main reason Pennsylvania voters should pick you?
Szefi: The diversity of my legal background and experience on the bench combine to make me the most-qualified candidate and, as discussed above, the one candidate who can fill the critical need our court faces. While I share the perspectives and support the efforts of our 10 recently elected judges who currently sit in the Criminal and Family Divisions, my current seat in the Civil Division must be filled with someone with the experience to handle the election docket, in addition to the breadth of matters filed in that division that affect all Allegheny County citizens.
The Legal: What will be your approach to moving matters efficiently through the case management system?
Szefi: The Court of Common Pleas has been trending in the direction of a truly assigned docket. I believe this trend should not only continue but be expedited. It will be a challenging task to be sure given the more than 15,000 matters filed in the Civil Division every year. The recently implemented mandatory mediation program is a great start and will aid in streamlining dockets, as will the continued growth of specialty courts within divisions. I support the continued expansion of those efforts. In addition, we must elect judges who are diligent and prepared. In short, judges who work. In my relatively short time on the bench I am confident that I have earned a reputation for being such a judge.
The Legal: What would you say to voters regarding your plans to ensure the equal administration of justice for all people?
Szefi: As a judge, it is my obligation to ensure that everyone receives equal treatment. Everyone. This starts with access. In the Civil Division, I sit on the Housing Court, where we maximize the use of remote proceedings to facilitate the participation of unrepresented parties. The use of such proceedings, particularly when dealing with unrepresented parties, must be utilized whenever possible. When appearing in court, people should see a court and staff that reflects the people it serves. I have made and continue to make every effort to maximize the applicant pools for the position I can fill to include groups historically underrepresented in our legal system. In addition, my staff and I engage in mandatory implicit bias education to ensure that we are always mindful of the biases that can and do affect everyone in our country.
The Legal: Where can voters go for more information about you?
Szefi: Go to www.andy4judge.com, any of our social media sites, or contact the campaign directly!
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
A New State Law Is a Positive Step Forward for Judicial Security in Pennsylvania—But More Action Is Needed
5 minute readCommentary: Sen. Casey's Critical Role in Keeping Pa. Federal Courts Full
As Appointment Window Narrows, Vacancies on Phila. Court May Linger Until After Primaries
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250