Anthony DeLuca Runs for Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas
'I have been involved in criminal justice reform as a member of the team that started Mental Health Court. I am best positioned to change existing programs and create new ones to aid those with mental health and addiction struggles in our courts.'
April 18, 2023 at 11:05 AM
3 minute read
JudgesCandidate: Anthony DeLuca
Court: Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas
Party: Democrat
Allegheny County Bar Association Rating: Highly Recommended
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal: Tell us about your background, where you went to law school, what firms you have practiced at, and areas of law you focus on.
Anthony DeLuca: College – Boston College, 1994. Law School – University of Pittsburgh School of Law, magna cum laude, 1997.
The Legal: What is one major thing about your career experience that most qualifies you for this position, and why?
DeLuca: I was an integral member of the small team that developed Mental Health Court in Allegheny County. Through developing the program at its early stages and then working with the cases, I developed a more collaborative view of the criminal justice process. By working diligently to understand the needs of defendants, victims, and communities, we were able to fashion case results that addressed, as best as possible, the varying concerns and needs of those parties. By looking beyond the sentencing matrix, we were often able to obtain results that satisfied the victims, treated the offender, and protected society by reducing recidivism. As a result, as a judge, I would be interested in serving as a judge on the Mental Health Court and other similar courts and looking elsewhere in the justice system to develop other areas in which a more collaborative approach would be useful. This experience will serve me well as a judge.
The Legal: What is the main reason Pennsylvania voters should pick you?
DeLuca: I am highly recommended by the Allegheny Bar Association. I have successfully practiced in every division of the Court of Common Pleas. Additionally, I am a union labor lawyer. Currently, it is my understanding that not one of the 43 judges on the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County is a former union labor lawyer. I believe having all backgrounds on the bench is useful and I would like to bring my experience as a union labor lawyer to the bench. Finally, I have been involved in criminal justice reform as a member of the team that started Mental Health Court. I am best positioned to change existing programs and create new ones to aid those with mental health and addiction struggles in our courts.
The Legal: What will be your approach to moving matters efficiently through the case management system?
DeLuca: I believe that all cases should be heard expeditiously. As a result, I will view my case calendar regularly to make sure cases are not lingering.
The Legal: What would you say to voters regarding your plans to ensure the equal administration of justice for all people?
DeLuca: The best way to ensure equal justice for all is to meet individuals charged with crimes at the front door of the criminal justice system with programs to assist those in need who do not present a clear and present threat to their communities. In such a way, we can make sure that all people are given the same opportunity for treatment and rehabilitation, not just people in wealthy communities who have greater resources to access such care.
The Legal: Where can voters go for more information about you?
DeLuca: DeLuca4Judge.com.
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/delucaforjudge
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/anthonydelucaforjudge
Twitter: https://twitter.com/delucaforjudge
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
A New State Law Is a Positive Step Forward for Judicial Security in Pennsylvania—But More Action Is Needed
5 minute readCommentary: Sen. Casey's Critical Role in Keeping Pa. Federal Courts Full
As Appointment Window Narrows, Vacancies on Phila. Court May Linger Until After Primaries
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250