Credit: freshidea/Adobe Stock Jill Scheidt Runs for Berks County Court of Common Pleas
"I will bring over three decades of extensive legal experience and my understanding of our community to the bench to ensure fair justice while protecting families and upholding the constitutional rights of all residents."
April 18, 2023 at 10:24 AM
2 minute read
Q&A
Candidate: Jill Scheidt
Court: Berks County Court of Common Pleas
Party: Democrat and Republican
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal Intelligencer: Tell us about your background, where you went to law school, what firms you have practiced at, and areas of law you focus on.
Jill Scheidt: I earned a Bachelor of Science in psychology from Penn State in 1989 and a Juris Doctorate from Villanova Law School in 1992. I was admitted to the Pennsylvania Bar in 1992 and have practiced in several firms and as a solo in Berks County over the last 30 years. I am currently a partner at Masano Bradley in Wyomissing. I have practiced in many different areas and currently focus on divorce, support and custody actions.
The Legal: What is one major thing about your career experience that most qualifies you for this position, and why?
Scheidt: My broad-based legal experience in and out of the courtroom most qualifies me for the position as Court of Common Pleas judge. I have litigated hundreds of civil, criminal and family cases from jury and bench trials through appeal to the Pennsylvania Superior and Supreme Court. I will bring over three decades of extensive legal experience and my understanding of our community to the bench to ensure fair justice while protecting families and upholding the constitutional rights of all residents.
The Legal: What is the main reason Pennsylvania voters should pick you?
Scheidt: I have the right combination of experience, skill and demeanor.
The Legal: What will be your approach to moving matters efficiently through the case management system?
Scheidt: I will schedule as many cases as possible to conduct trials and hearings to conclusion swiftly. Litigants have a right to finality, and I will have a full docket.
The Legal: What would you say to voters regarding your plans to ensure the equal administration of justice for all people?
Scheidt: I will ensure that all parties have the opportunity to be heard, and if they need assistance such as an interpreter I will assess the situation and use whatever resources are available.
The Legal: Where can voters go for more information about you?
Scheidt: www.electjillscheidt.com
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Matt's Corner: Court of Judicial Discipline-Presumed Prejudicial Delay
3 minute read
Ethical Considerations in Representing an Organizational Client and Its Constituents
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 2SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About,' Says Jennifer A. Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 4Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 5St. Ivo: Patron Saint of Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
