Judge Matthew Wolf Runs for Commonwealth Court
'I have years judicial experience, and I currently serve as a judge. My plaintiffs civil rights background informed my role as a judge who focuses on equity and access to justice. I've made many policy changes in the Civil Division of the Philadelphia Municipal Court with an eye toward equity and access to justice.'
April 21, 2023 at 02:45 PM
4 minute read
Candidate: Judge Matthew Wolf
Court: Commonwealth
Party: Democrat
Pennsylvania Bar Association rating: Recommended
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal: Tell us about your background, where you went to law school, what firms you have practiced at, and areas of law you focus on.
Judge Matthew Wolf: My father was a lawyer, and I started working with him in college. I went to Loyola University School of Law in New Orleans and finished as a visiting student at Rutgers University in Camden, New Jersey, while I continued to work with my father. We were partners eventually, and then I went out on my own. I only worked at one other firm, Cohen Seglias, in Philadelphia from 2000 to 2001. Other than that I have been on my own. I started out doing complex commercial litigation, and that evolved into civil rights work, mostly employment discrimination, wrongful termination and claims against the government by individuals. I did a lot of work for recovery homes under the Fair Housing Act fighting attempts to shut them down.
The Legal: What is one major thing about your career experience that most qualifies you for this position, and why?
Wolf: I've been a judge for over five years. No other candidate who has qualified to run for the Commonwealth Court, Republican or Democrat, has served as a judge, and this is an appellate (with some original jurisdiction) position that should require judicial experience. I have a lot of first-chair trial and appellate experience as well. I am well regarded as a judge, having received an award from the Philadelphia Bar Association, and I am now supervising the Civil Division of the Philadelphia Municipal Court, which is a recognition of my abilities to engage in judicial management.
The Legal: What is the main reason Pennsylvania voters should pick you?
Wolf: I have years judicial experience, and I currently serve as a judge. My plaintiffs civil rights background informed my role as a judge who focuses on equity and access to justice. I've made many policy changes in the Civil Division of the Philadelphia Municipal Court with an eye toward equity and access to justice. I am recommended by the state Bar Association and the Philadelphia Bar Association to be a judge on the Commonwealth Court.
The Legal: What will be your approach to moving matters efficiently through the case management system?
Wolf: A solid work ethic. I practice law for 25 years, mostly on my own, and prepared cases for trial. I picked juries and got verdicts. That was hard work. I've carried that work ethic through as a judge where I serve as a supervisor of the Civil Division, for which I receive no additional pay, but feel as though I can make the system better as a result of my involvement. I plan on applying that work ethic to my work as a Commonwealth judge, which I understand is a busy court.
The Legal: What would you say to voters regarding your plans to ensure the equal administration of justice for all people?
Wolf: Judge me not by what I promise to do, but what I have accomplished already. Evictions were disproportionately impacting Black and Hispanic female heads of households and as the architect of the court-ordered eviction diversion program, I helped contribute to ameliorate the disproportionate impact arising out of our court for evictions during the pandemic by requiring pre-filing mediation, which, during the peak of the expenditure of the $300 million of federal funds in Philadelphia County resulted in 93% of cases resolved in pre-filing. A tremendous judicial management tool that benefited landlords and tenants. We were never hit with the tidal wave of evictions. Additionally, I have been focusing on purchased-debt cases, of which thousands of cases pass through our courts. We are focused on reducing default judgments and working with creditor attorneys to ensure that cases are properly processed and adjudicated. This is equity work because judgments (which, again, disproportionately affect Black and Hispanics female heads of households) prevent people from getting quality licensed apartments and mortgages, housing in general, in the poorest large city in North America, where we also have a housing crisis. We've made many changes to ensure there is access to justice from our newly designed website to how we handle unrepresented litigants in our court, making it more user friendly and manageable.
The Legal: Where can voters go for more information about you?
Wolf: www.judgemattwolf.com
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudicial Appointments After Casey: Observers Wary but Hopeful Bipartisan Spirit Will Continue
Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readHouse Passes Bill to Add Federal Judgeships in Face of Biden Veto Threat
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250