Judge Patricia A. McCullough Runs for State Supreme Court
'I am the only candidate who has handled and upheld the Constitutional rights of the people in critical matters concerning election integrity, limiting the governor's COVID mandates, upholding the Second Amendment, (four times in last year alone), congressional redistricting, constitutional challenges to state laws, taxes, environmental issues and more.'
April 21, 2023 at 02:31 PM
6 minute read
Q&ACandidate: Judge Patricia A. McCullough
Court: State Supreme Court
Party: Republican
Pennsylvania Bar Association rating: Not Recommended for failure to participate
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal Intelligencer: Tell us about your background, where you went to law school, what firms you have practiced at, and areas of law you focus on.
Judge Patricia A. McCullough: I have served as a statewide appellate court judge on the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania for over 12 years and am currently in my second 10-year term. I have handled complex civil and administrative and litigation matters concerning the Constitutions of Pennsylvania and the United States, and challenges to laws and government action, including election integrity, second amendment, education, zoning, insurance, redistricting, Right to Know Law, workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, taxes, PUC, freedom of religion etc. I was appointed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court as a member and chair of Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee for six years. I served as a trial court judge in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas when I was appointed by the governor, with the unanimous consent of state Senate in 2005.
For 25 years I practiced as an attorney in private, corporate and government sectors. I served as assistant general counsel at the University of Pittsburgh, an adjunct faculty member, member of the NCAA Career Counseling panel, judicial clerk, chair of the Allegheny County Board of Property Appeals, executive director of Catholic Charities, where I oversaw the implementation of its free health care center and in private practice handling litigation, prof employment contracts, zoning, nonprofit corporations, estate, tax and miscellaneous matters.
I received my Bachelor of Arts from the University of Pittsburgh, graduating magna cum laude, and my Juris Doctorate from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. I served as an officer of the student bar association and received a senatorial scholarship. I clerked in the Allegheny County District Attorney's Office throughout law school, clerked at a small private practice firm, clerked for Sen. Mike Fisher and was a judicial law clerk for Judge Sam Rodgers.
The Legal: What is one major thing about your career experience that most qualifies you for this position, and why?
McCullough: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in Pennsylvania. I am the only Republican candidate who is an appellate court judge, and the only candidate who has over 12 years of experience as an appellate court judge. Having reviewed decisions of trial court judges and state and local agencies, I have developed an expertise in applying the standard of review required for the Supreme Court. I am the only candidate who has handled and upheld the Constitutional rights of the people in critical matters concerning election integrity, limiting the governor's COVID mandates, upholding the Second Amendment, (four times in last year alone), congressional redistricting, constitutional challenges to state laws, taxes, environmental issues and more.
As a Commonwealth Court judge I also sit as a statewide trial court judge in matters concerning the governor, state Senate and House, constitutional challenges to state laws, etc. I have gained important administrative experience by serving on the Commonwealth Court's IOP committee, the annual budget and case report committee, the search committees for the executive director and the prothonotary, and serving as secretary for our judicial conferences. Additionally, my role as chair of the Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee required oversight of and coordination with judges, high-level attorneys specialized in their fields, and the prothonotaries of the appellate courts. I also served as a trial court judge and practiced as an attorney for 25 years in private, corporate and government sectors.
The Legal: What is the main reason Pennsylvania voters should pick you?
McCullough: We are in a constitutional crisis. I have the experience required to hit the ground running on day one in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to uphold the constitutional rights of the people. I will continue to abide by my oath and uphold the Constitution, as written, and the rights and liberties of the people in critical matters impacting every Pennsylvanian. In the last year alone I upheld the second amendment four times, ruled in favor of limiting the governor's COVID mandates, joined in ruling Act 77 is unconstitutional, opined health care workers who are fired for choosing to wear a mask instead of take COVID vaccine should not lose unemployment compensation benefits, presided as the trial judge over the Congressional Redistricting case and upheld the constitutional right of legislature to draw the map, as well as other important decisions protecting election integrity and other rights in Pennsylvania. The people can see from my record that I abide by my oath to uphold the Constitution and do not legislate from the bench. I am fair and impartial and uphold the rule of law. It is critical that we elect a justice who will uphold the Constitution and fairly apply the rule of law. I will continue to do that as a justice on the Supreme Court.
The Legal: What will be your approach to moving matters efficiently through the case management system?
McCullough: As a member and chair of the Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee, I have already worked on issues concerning PACFile and other matters to improve efficient processing of cases. It is also necessary to ensure that courts across Pennsylvania are equipped to process cases in the event of emergency or heath issues. [The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts] and the Supreme Court have been working with courts statewide to assist in improving the ability of all courts to continue to process cases in those circumstances. It is also critical to have continuing dialogue with the legal community concerning difficulties they are experiencing and quickly work to resolve them. I will continue to engage in the ongoing process of oversight to make the courts accessible and efficient.
The Legal: What would you say to voters regarding your plans to ensure the equal administration of justice for all people?
McCullough: As a justice I will work to uphold compliance with the constitutional mandates for due process of law and that no person be denied within our jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. As I did on the Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee, I will work to simplify the rules to ensure access to the courts, including for pro se parties. During the COVID pandemic, the Commonwealth Court continued to process cases, hear argument and conduct hearings and trials through online access or in-court attendance with courtroom health precautions put in place. I will work to ensure similar access will be provided. I have also worked with many programs that help to improve the system of justice which includes those for veterans, victims, drug addiction, youth at risk, human trafficking and reducing recidivism. I will continue to abide by my oath to uphold the Constitutions of Pennsylvania and the United States, and I will be fair and impartial and uphold the rule of law.
The Legal: Where can voters go for more information about you?
McCullough: Info@judgemccullough4supremecourt or www.judgemccullough4supremecourt.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMatt's Corner: Court of Judicial Discipline-Presumed Prejudicial Delay
3 minute readEthical Considerations in Representing an Organizational Client and Its Constituents
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250