![Kristine Howard](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/04/Kristine-Howard-767x633.jpg)
Kristine C. Howard Runs for Chester County Court of Common Pleas
'If voters want to know my commitment to the equal administration of justice, all they have to do is look at my record. ... As a state representative, I have been an advocate for social and economic justice and particularly mindful of policy and reforms intended to level the playing field for everyone.'
April 26, 2023 at 03:43 PM
5 minute read
Q&ACandidate: Kristine C. Howard
Court: Chester County Court of Common Pleas
Party: Democrat
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal: Tell us about your background, where you went to law school, what firms you have practiced at, and areas of law you focus on.
Kristine C. Howard: I am a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and Rutgers Law School. I started my legal career at a legal aid clinic in New Mexico, serving an underserved and impoverished community. When I returned to the Philadelphia area, I worked as an administrator with Philadelphia Lawyers for the Arts and represented children in foster care as a volunteer attorney with Support Center for Child Advocates. After my youngest child entered school, I reentered the workforce with the Pennsylvania Auditor General's Office assigned to audit the offices of magisterial district judges. I left that position to join the Chester County department of children and family services to work as a child abuse investigator.
My experiences, in a system ill-equipped to address the underlying societal issues, motivated me to run for state representative in 2018. As a state legislator, I have focused my work on issues pertaining to children, issues of economic justice, criminal justice reform, family law reform and reproductive rights. I have been on the children and youth committee for four years and am currently on the judiciary committee. I was appointed by Gov. [Tom] Wolf to the Juvenile Justice Task Force.
The Legal: What is one major thing about your career experience that most qualifies you for this position, and why?
Howard: There are several elements of my career I believe uniquely qualify me to be a judge. My experiences as a child abuse investigator and throughout my career have prepared me in important ways. I have worked with many families experiencing poverty, mental health issues, drug abuse, immigration problems and more. Many of my clients had multiple interactions with the court system. These experiences with people suffering from negative societal forces, driven into the legal system, provides me with a perspective different from many lawyers and judges.
The Legal: What is the main reason Pennsylvania voters should pick you?
Howard: Unlike many candidates for judicial positions, voters have a clear picture of who I am. I have a voting record as a legislator and have published opinions on issues and policy. Additionally, I have been endorsed, in my campaigns for state representative, by leading advocacy groups and organizations that have clear points of view further informing voters about the perspective I will bring to the bench. I have been involved in my community for decades, first as a mother of seven children, with all the activities and connections that brought and then as a state representative, attending countless events and meeting members of the community for the past five years.
The Legal: What will be your approach to moving matters efficiently through the case management system?
Howard: I believe judges already have the tools and powers they need to move matters through the case management system efficiently and it is imperative they use them. As someone who has been in family court as a litigant, I learned firsthand how important it is to prevent unnecessary delays. Like many of us in the performance of our work-related tasks and responsibilities, it is not unusual that some of what we do becomes routine, seemingly repetitive and not necessarily requiring our full focus and attention. It is foreseeable that lawyers and judges experience the same kinds of feelings, but it is not at all acceptable. What may seem routine to officials of the courts is likely perceived much differently by the litigants they serve. For many, their day in court may be the most important and financially challenging experience in their lives. We have a sacred obligation to assure everyone interacting with our court system knows that their time and resources are equally important and respected by lawyers and judges.
The Legal: What would you say to voters regarding your plans to ensure the equal administration of justice for all people?
Howard: If voters want to know my commitment to the equal administration of justice, all they have to do is look at my record. For most of us when we think about who is most likely to experience inequities in the justice system, we think of minorities, lower-income people and people without the means and connections to retain legal representation and assistance. As a state representative, I have been an advocate for social and economic justice and particularly mindful of policy and reforms intended to level the playing field for everyone. Also, my work on the governor's Juvenile Justice Task Force made me more aware of issues and problems facing young people in the court system. May I add, my personal experiences in family court introduced me to the challenges many women face in divorce and custody disputes, especially if they have been out of the work force and are not the primary earners for their family.
The Legal: Where can voters go for more information about you?
Howard: www.KristineHoward.com; https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/biography/179557/kristine-howard
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Cozen O'Connor's Bernard Nash Pioneered the Modern State AGs Practice. Now He's Hanging Up His Boots Cozen O'Connor's Bernard Nash Pioneered the Modern State AGs Practice. Now He's Hanging Up His Boots](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/fb/8a/824b62d848c3a0021a5601fcd72f/bernie-nash-767x633.jpg)
Cozen O'Connor's Bernard Nash Pioneered the Modern State AGs Practice. Now He's Hanging Up His Boots
6 minute read![Cohen Seglias Leader Discusses Growing From Construction Practice into Full-Service Law Firm Cohen Seglias Leader Discusses Growing From Construction Practice into Full-Service Law Firm](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bf/1c/629b21124b548565de75272f13ea/williams-steve-767x633-1.jpg)
Cohen Seglias Leader Discusses Growing From Construction Practice into Full-Service Law Firm
![Matt's Corner: Recent Trends in Legal Malpractice Matt's Corner: Recent Trends in Legal Malpractice](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2022/01/Matthew-Weisberg-767x633.jpg)
![Matt's Corner: Judicial 'Disrepute'—De Minimis Defense? Matt's Corner: Judicial 'Disrepute'—De Minimis Defense?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2022/01/Matthew-Weisberg-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250