The SEC's Rulemaking and Enforcement Priorities in 2023
Certain commission activities in 2022, such as proposed rules mandating climate disclosures, amendments to the proxy process, and enforcement actions in the crypto assets space, look set to form the foundation of the SEC's rulemaking and enforcement agenda in 2023 as set forth in this overview.
April 27, 2023 at 10:21 AM
7 minute read
Securities LitigationThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or the commission), under Chair Gary Gensler, was active during 2022 in its attempt to fulfil its stated three-part mission—to protect investors; maintain fair, orderly and efficient markets; and facilitate capital formation, and the commission looks set to continue this trend into 2023.
Certain commission activities in 2022, such as proposed rules mandating climate disclosures, amendments to the proxy process, and enforcement actions in the crypto assets space, look set to form the foundation of the SEC's rulemaking and enforcement agenda in 2023 as set forth in this overview.
SEC Rulemaking Priorities in 2023
Climate-Related Disclosures
It is anticipated that climate-related disclosures will continue to be a focus of the SEC's rulemaking, with final rules expected imminently following the SEC's proposed rules issued in March 2022. These proposed rules would require registrants to include certain climate-related disclosures in their registration statements and periodic reports, including information about climate-related risks that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on their business, results of operations, or financial condition, and certain climate-related financial statement metrics in a note to their audited financial statements.
The proposal garnered significant comments from various stakeholders, with the SEC receiving more than 5,000 unique comments on the proposal. Though there is general support for climate-related disclosures in some form, there are differing opinions on the details of specific aspects of the proposal. While the SEC's regulatory agenda initially indicated that a final rule would be approved by October 2022, the extensive volume of comments received on the proposal and a technical glitch that impacted the SEC's receipt of comments for this proposal delayed the issuance of any final rule. Given the level of public attention and divergent opinions surrounding the proposed rules, it seems likely that legal challenges to the final rule will be made almost immediately, potentially delaying implementation of the final rule.
Despite rumors that the SEC may dial back some of its proposed rules on climate-related disclosures, issuers should still pay close attention to such disclosures given the high priority placed upon enforcement actions on ESG issues by the commission. Issuers should expect continued focus in 2023 by the SEC on climate-related disclosures and should continue to follow the 2010 guidance and the staff's sample comment letter on climate-related disclosures issued in September 2021 to guide their disclosure practice.
Human Capital Including Board Diversity
The SEC has also indicated that it will propose disclosure rules relating to human capital in 2023 that will supplement what it adopted in fall 2020. According to its regulatory agenda, the commission intends to release a proposal on human capital management disclosure this spring. In prepared remarks at London City Week in June 2021, Gensler suggested that a human capital disclosure proposal could include metrics such as workforce turnover, skills and development training, compensation, benefits, and workforce demographics that include diversity and health and safety. A rule proposal on corporate board diversity disclosures is also on the SEC's regulatory agenda for 2023, though no details about this proposal have been provided.
Cybersecurity
Issuers should also expect further rulemaking regarding cybersecurity. The SEC plans to implement a final rule this spring that would mandate public company disclosures regarding cybersecurity risk governance. The proposed rule, which was introduced in March 2022, would require registrants to report on material cyber incidents and periodically disclose information about their policies and procedures for identifying and managing cybersecurity risks, as well as management's involvement and expertise in assessing and managing these risks. Similar to the climate-related disclosure proposal, the cybersecurity proposal would also require issuers to disclose information about their board's involvement with cybersecurity, including the presence of a director with cybersecurity expertise and the nature of such expertise. Given the continuing challenges companies face that are posed by malicious software and hacking, the SEC staff is expected to continue monitoring issuers' cybersecurity disclosures in 2023 and has advised issuers to refer to the commission's 2018 statement and guidance on public company cybersecurity disclosures when preparing SEC filings.
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)
In late 2021, Gensler gave remarks before the Healthy Markets Association Conference where he highlighted what he saw a disparity between the disclosure requirements in a traditional IPO and in what he refers to as a "SPAC Target IPO" and contended that all "investors deserve the protections they receive from traditional IPOs." In March 2022, the SEC announced proposed rules, in line with Gensler's stated opinion, that aim to cause SPACs to be treated more like traditional IPOs and to provide SPAC investors the same level of protections as those afforded to an investor in a traditional IPO. The proposed rule would require additional disclosures for SPACs conducting an IPO or de-SPAC transaction, including information about sponsor roles, conflicts of interest, shareholder dilution, and transaction fairness. The SEC has indicated that it plans to take action on a final rule related to SPAC disclosures by spring 2023.
Proxy Process
In 2023, issuers can anticipate further rulemaking relating to the proxy process. The SEC's recent rulemaking in this area has proven controversial. In October 2020, the SEC adopted highly controversial amendments to Rule 14a-8 related to shareholder proposals that resulted in much heated debate, both at open meetings of the commission and comments submitted to the commission. In July 2022, the SEC proposed new amendments to Rule 14a-8, which generally mandate companies to include shareholder proposals in their proxy statements unless there is a basis for exclusion, by clarifying and actually narrowing three substantive bases for exclusion of shareholder proposals in proxy statements. Similar to the reaction provoked by the October 2020 amendments, the proposed amendments resulted in divergent views between the investor and issuer communities. The SEC has identified October 2023 as the target date for publishing the final rule.
SEC Enforcement Priorities in 2023
We can expect to see continued focus on enforcement by the SEC in 2023. The commission's enforcement program is likely to focus on high-priority issues such as crypto assets and ESG-related disclosures.
Crypto Assets
The SEC's oversight of the crypto asset industry was a significant topic of discussion in 2022 and is expected to remain so in 2023. Gensler maintains his stance that most crypto assets are securities and should be subject to existing SEC registration requirements. He has also stressed the importance of companies in the crypto asset space complying with all securities laws and regulations. The SEC has not yet included any crypto asset-focused rulemaking on its regulatory agenda and is instead taking a "regulation by enforcement" approach to crypto assets.
On May 3, 2022, reflecting the SEC's focus on crypto assets, the SEC announced that the Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit would nearly double its size to 50 dedicated positions, including trial counsel. The expanded unit would "focus on investigating securities law violations related to crypto asset offerings, exchanges, broker-dealers, and lending and staking products; decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms; nonfungible tokens (NFTs); and stablecoins." The SEC took several actions in 2022 relating to crypto assets, including against a crypto lending platform for allegedly offering unregistered securities and failing to register as an investment company and cases charging providers of digital assets with unregistered securities offerings.
In addition, on Dec. 8, 2022, the SEC issued a sample letter discussing recent developments in crypto-asset markets and urged companies to evaluate their disclosures about the impact that bankruptcies and financial distress have had or may have on their business and consider whether existing disclosures should be updated. High-profile bankruptcies in the crypto industry ensure that crypto-related enforcement in an effort to safeguard investors will remain a priority of the SEC throughout 2023.
Katayun I. Jaffari is chair of the corporate governance group and co-chair of the capital markets and securities and ESG groups at Cozen O'Connor. She counsels public and private companies in the areas of corporate governance and securities law and compliance, including capital-raising transactions and reporting requirements under SEC, NYSE and Nasdaq regulations. She can be reached at [email protected] or 215-665-4622.
John Crozier is an associate in the firm's corporate department and a member of the capital markets and securities practice group. He can be reached at [email protected] or 612-260-9077.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Training to Replace Yourself': Kessler Topaz Co-Founder Set to Retire
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
- 2While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 3The Definition of Special Employment
- 4People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
- 5Rawle & Henderson Hires New Del. Managing Partner
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250