Stare decisis is one of the fundamental principles of American jurisprudence. “It protects the interests of those who have taken action in reliance on a past decision.” See Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U.S. ___, slip op. at 39 (2022). “’Precedent is a way of accumulating and passing down the learning of past generations, a font of established wisdom richer than what can be found in any single judge or panel of judges.,” (quoting N. Gorsuch, A Republic, If You Can Keep It at 217 (Forum Books 2019). For the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), however, stare decisis is often an impediment to desired outcomes, more honored in its breach than in the observance. The disregard for precedent likely results from the fact that the NLRB “is not a court whose jurisdiction over violations of private rights must be exercised. It is an administrative agency whose function is to adjudicate public rights in a manner that will effectuate the purpose of the National Labor Relations Act.” See Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U.S.1, 13 (1957) (Burton, J. dissenting). The Supreme Court has recognized that administrative adjudication is a “’constant process of trial and error.’” See NLRB v. J. Weingarten, 420 U.S. 251, 266 (1975) (quoting NLRB v. Seven-Up, 344 U.S. 344, 349 (1953). Indeed, the court has observed that the trial and error approach “differentiates perhaps more than anything else the administrative from the judicial process.”
The five members of the NLRB are appointed by the president, subject to Senate confirmation, and serve staggered terms of five years, “excepting that any individual chosen to fill a vacancy shall be appointed only for the unexpired term of the member whom he shall succeed.” The general counsel of the NLRB is also appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate to a four-year term, and “is independent from the board and is responsible for the investigation and prosecution of unfair labor practice cases …” https://www.nlrb.gov/bio/general-counsel; 29 U.S.C. Section 153(d).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]