Power Players 2023: Jasmeet Ahuja
Jasmeet Ahuja represented the Philadelphia in Armstrong, defending an ordinance that would require firearms owners to report a lost or stolen firearm to the police. A coalition of high-profile amici including several Pennsylvania municipalities and gun violence organizations lent their support to Ahuja, who won a groundbreaking concurrence in Armstrong that was later adopted in Crawford.
June 09, 2023 at 05:12 PM
4 minute read
Q&ABy The Legal Intelligencer
Jasmeet Ahuja, Hogan Lovells
In related cases, City of Philadelphia v. Armstrong, 271 A.3d 555 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2022) and Crawford v. Commonwealth, 277 A.3d 649 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2022), Ahuja successfully broke a 26-year blockade in the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court that had repeatedly interpreted the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's opinion in Ortiz v. Commonwealth, 681 A.2d 154 (Pa. 1996), as barring any local regulation of firearms. Ahuja represented the Philadelphia in Armstrong, defending an ordinance that would require firearms owners to report a lost or stolen firearm to the police. A coalition of high-profile amici including several Pennsylvania municipalities and gun violence organizations lent their support to Ahuja, who won a groundbreaking concurrence in Armstrong that was later adopted in Crawford where President Judge Emerita Bonnie Leadbetter explained that, were she "not bound by controlling precedent … she would affirm the trial court" and "urged the Supreme Court to reconsider the breadth of the Ortiz doctrine and allow for local restrictions narrowly tailored to local necessities."
Ahuja is now set to argue before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court regarding the scope and constitutionality of Section 6120 in Crawford, again with the backing of several Pennsylvania municipalities and co-counsel The Public Interest Law Center. It will be the first time in 27 years that the court will be hearing any case on this statute that is having life and death consequences for residents across the commonwealth.
How did you remain effective in light of all the challenges the legal field faced this year?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCohen Seglias Leader Discusses Growing From Construction Practice into Full-Service Law Firm
Matt's Corner: Court of Judicial Discipline-Presumed Prejudicial Delay
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250