![Allie Dempsey of Klasko Immigration Law Partners. Courtesy photo](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/06/Allie-Dempsey-767x633-1.jpg)
EB-1 Spotlight: Challenging the Status Quo
There has been an increasing level of interest in the EB-1A extraordinary ability classification in particular. However, practitioners and potential applicants should be mindful of several challenges that can arise when seeking permanent residence on the basis of extraordinary ability.
June 12, 2023 at 12:17 PM
6 minute read
As layoffs continue throughout the tech industry and other parts of the U.S. economy, many foreign workers who have lost their employment have also been faced with significant immigration issues. The immediate issue for many such workers is the potential loss of underlying or temporary status. For example, a laid-off worker in H-1B status only gets a limited 60-day grace period during which a terminated employee can remain in the United States and try to find a new employer sponsor. However, another pressing issue for many foreign workers is sponsorship for U.S. permanent residency, or a green card, which is often also tied to an employer sponsor.
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), however, provides two paths to a green card that can be pursued independently of employer sponsorship, specifically EB-1A extraordinary ability classification (INA Section 203(b)(1)(A)) and the EB-2 national interest waiver (INA Section 203(b)(2)(B)). Although the legal standards for these classifications are different, both allow a foreign worker the flexibility to self-sponsor for permanent status if they can meet the high evidentiary standards for these categories via extensive documentation. This can provide a greater sense of security in an unstable market, as well as more freedom to voluntarily change employment. The EB-1A category also offers the added benefit of a drastically shorter wait time for a green card for individuals emigrating from severely backlogged countries (i.e., India and China).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy? Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/8f/0d/9830864b4091be74cb5ce64e2fce/nick-lowrey-767x633.jpg)
Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
6 minute read![EB-5 Immigration Investor Program: a Win-Win Program, or Is It? EB-5 Immigration Investor Program: a Win-Win Program, or Is It?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/01/Kyle-Garabedian-767x633.jpg)
![Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business? Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c6/09/887e18ff42bda2b42ebaaf3e0681/immigration-ice-detention-3-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute read![The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/04/41/7d4ee3034009b995b2795f6ee611/generations-2-767x633.jpg)
The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know
14 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
- 2Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
- 3Your Communications Are Not Secure! What Legal Professionals Need to Know
- 4Legal Leaders Need To Create A High-Trust Culture
- 5There's a New Chief Judge in Town: Meet the Top Miami Jurist
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250