On June 13, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit heard oral arguments in Drazen v. Pinto, No. 21-10199 (11th Cir.), a case that could represent a substantial departure from circuit precedent regarding the constitutional standing of claimants under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The Drazen court, sitting en banc, will reconsider a three-judge panel's decision to vacate the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama's certification and final approval of a TCPA settlement class. The panel vacated the district court's decision on the basis that certain class members received a single unsolicited text message and, thus, lacked a concrete injury sufficient to confer Article III standing. See 41 F. 4th 1354 (11th Cir. 2022). As the lone federal circuit to have affirmatively held that the receipt of a single text message is insufficient to establish Article III standing, the Eleventh Circuit's decision in this appeal has significant implications for future TCPA class action litigation.