![(L-R)Mark L. Mattioli and Jaskirat K. Strandquest of Post & Schell. Courtesy photo](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/06/Mattioli-Strandquest-767x633.jpg)
Protection of Health Info Post-'Dobbs': Providers and Patients Are Stuck in the Middle
Dobbs raises a multitude of new and thorny legal issues outside of the constitutional context.
June 30, 2023 at 05:24 PM
11 minute read
Special SectionsThe U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization,142 S. Ct. 2288 (2022) which overruled the long-standing precedent of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) and held that there was no federally protected constitutional right to an abortion heralded a sea change in the law and has resulted in massive inconsistencies in whether, and under what circumstances, abortions are legal in various states. In this regard, multiple states have enacted either outright bans on abortions or have restricted, considerably, the circumstances under which the procedure can be performed. This inconsistency sometimes results in contiguous states having drastic differences in whether the procedure is legal and, on some occasions, whether the recipient and the provider can be charged with a criminal offense. Currently, 13 states have banned abortion completely and 31 states ban abortion after a certain period or gestation and at least one state (Texas) permits private citizens to file lawsuits against providers who perform abortions. see Guttmacher Institute, State Bans on Abortion Throughout Pregnancy, May 31, 2023.
The drastic differences between contiguous states regarding whether abortion is legal is demonstrated by the differing laws of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, New York, Ohio and West Virginia. Abortions are currently legal in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, New York and Ohio at the present time. However, Ohio enacted legislation that would ban abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. See 2019 Bill Text OH S.B. 23. Although the law became effective on June 24, 2022, it is currently being challenged in the courts and is not yet effective. The Ohio law requires state-directed counseling and a wait of 24 hours before the procedure is performed. To discourage the procedure, the counseling must be provided in person. Health plans included in Ohio's exchange can only cover the procedure in cases of endangerment of life or in cases of rape or incest. Additionally, West Virginia has an outright ban on all abortions unless the procedure is required to save the woman's life, to preserve physical health, if the fetus is not expected to survive and as a result of rape or incest. See 2022 WV HB302.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Pa. Supreme Court to Decide Enforceability of 'Browsewrap' Arbitration Agreements Pa. Supreme Court to Decide Enforceability of 'Browsewrap' Arbitration Agreements](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/95/ae/f89a8bc14336b41212b4b02d3326/selmasska-green-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Supreme Court to Decide Enforceability of 'Browsewrap' Arbitration Agreements
8 minute read![From a Mediator’s Perspective: Common Mis-steps That Parties Make at Mediation From a Mediator’s Perspective: Common Mis-steps That Parties Make at Mediation](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/6b/d9/0fdb00614b8b8b2df500dd2d045d/andrew-horowitz-767x633.jpg)
From a Mediator’s Perspective: Common Mis-steps That Parties Make at Mediation
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250