![Cliff Rieders, of Rieders, Travis, Humphrey, Waters, & Dorhmann. Courtesy photo](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2021/08/Cliff-Rieders-767x633.jpg)
Prisoner Rights, Involuntary Servitude, Forced Labor and the Minimum Wage
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit case of Burrell v. Staff, 60 F.4th 25 (3d Cir. 2023) (Nygaard, C.J.), raises interesting and rarely used legal procedures for relief.
July 13, 2023 at 12:55 PM
12 minute read
CommentaryThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit case of Burrell v. Staff, 60 F.4th 25 (3d Cir. 2023) (Nygaard, C.J.), raises interesting and rarely used legal procedures for relief.
Plaintiffs William Burrell Jr., Joshua Huzzard and Dampsey Stuckey were held in civil contempt and sentenced to incarceration for not paying child support. They challenged Lackawanna County's policy of conditioning incarcerated civil contemnor child support debtors' access to regularly paid work release—which would have enabled them to earn the money they needed to secure their freedom from incarceration—on first working for half of their sentences sorting through trash at the county recycling center, in purportedly hazardous and disgusting conditions, for sub-minimum wage, 63 cents per hour ($5 per day). The plaintiffs brought several claims against Lackawanna County, the county's Solid Waste Management Authority, Lackawanna County Recycling Center, (the private corporation to which the authority outsources the operation of its Recycling Center) (corporation) and the corporation's owners (brothers Louis and Dominick DeNaples), arising out of the plaintiffs' nearly unpaid labor at the recycling center, including claims that the terms of their incarceration amounted to involuntary servitude.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025 A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cd/23/76b0a8704961932ccc99295b7feb/katayun-jaffari-2-767x633.jpg)
![The Importance of Judicial Elections The Importance of Judicial Elections](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cd/eb/605bd42e4982b5ccf4b68aa325a2/people-asking-questions-767x633.jpg)
![AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand? AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/06/Chat-GPT-767x633.jpg)
AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
![Neighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next? Neighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4f/93/1388ec7e492cb1f4f5c73fa23380/rollo-dennen-baccare-767x633.jpg)
Neighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250