![Paul Hallgren, left, and Mehrnaz Jalali, right, of Cozen O'Connor. Courtesy photos](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/07/Hallgren-Jalali-767x633.jpg)
The SEC Increases Disclosure Requirements for Issuer Share Repurchases
This article focuses on the rule changes as they relate to reporting companies that are domestic issuers, even though certain of the amendments apply more broadly, such as to foreign private issuers.
July 31, 2023 at 09:41 AM
7 minute read
On May 3, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments to the disclosure requirements relating to repurchases of an issuer's securities. The amended rules require companies to disclose on a quarterly basis quantitative information about their share repurchases and check a box indicating if certain directors or officers traded within four business days before or after the public announcement of an issuer's repurchase program. In addition, the amendments expand existing disclosure requirements so that issuers must disclose: the objectives or rationales for their repurchases and the process or criteria they used in determining the amount of repurchases, and any policies and procedures relating to purchases and sales of issuer securities during a repurchase program by the issuer's officers and directors, including any restriction on such transactions. Lastly, the SEC adopted new rules to require issuers to disclose on Forms 10-Q and 10-K whether they have adopted or terminated Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. The SEC's stated goals in adopting the amendments is to increase transparency and lessen information asymmetry, along with providing investors with material information to evaluate the purposes and effects of share repurchase programs. This article focuses on the rule changes as they relate to reporting companies that are domestic issuers, even though certain of the amendments apply more broadly, such as to foreign private issuers.
Issuers that file Forms 10-Q and 10-K will be required to comply with the new disclosure and tagging requirements, which are further described below, in their periodic reports beginning with the first filing that covers the first full fiscal quarter that begins on or after October 1, 2023. As a result, calendar-year companies will first need to comply with the new rule regime in connection with the filing of their Forms 10-K for fiscal year 2023 to be filed in early 2024. There are no exceptions to the filing requirements for smaller reporting companies or emerging growth companies, or with respect to issuers with securities that are not traded on an exchange.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Key Updates for Annual Reports on Form 10-K for Public Companies Key Updates for Annual Reports on Form 10-K for Public Companies](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4f/33/64aac85f44379902e0cb7ed55ed5/jalali-ozer-popick-767x633.jpg)
![The Crypto Guys Seem to Like Paul Atkins as a New SEC Commissioner, but Will He Be Good for the Securities Industry? The Crypto Guys Seem to Like Paul Atkins as a New SEC Commissioner, but Will He Be Good for the Securities Industry?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/415/2020/08/secbuildinghqnljmi.jpg)
The Crypto Guys Seem to Like Paul Atkins as a New SEC Commissioner, but Will He Be Good for the Securities Industry?
6 minute read![The Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions The Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/02/Dubow-Cline-Krnjaja-767x633-1.jpg)
The Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions
10 minute read![Navigating the SEC's Focus on AI Disclosures Navigating the SEC's Focus on AI Disclosures](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/10/Merhnaz-Jalali-767x633.jpg)
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250