![Jennifer M. Horn of Horn Williamson. Courtesy photo](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/07/Jennifer-Horn_4-767x633.jpg)
The Construction Nightmare Next Door—It's No 'Party' When Excavations Go Wrong
The role of the construction attorney in this instance is to attempt to minimize the damage, effectively assert all relevant causes of action, and ensure that any applicable insurance policies are triggered. Careless or negligent excavation practices have long been the main culprits in these cases, which are disastrous for both the contractor and neighboring family.
August 01, 2023 at 11:18 AM
7 minute read
Special SectionsIn an era of booming new construction, projects located immediately adjacent to occupied Philadelphia row homes are numerous throughout the city. But with such growth comes great risk to these adjoining structures and the families living within. Damages to the neighboring family structure often include the loss of quiet enjoyment of the premises, forced evacuation, disruption, diminution of the home's market value, damage to the property's party walls and subsequent interior damage to the property, including microbial growth. The role of the construction attorney in this instance is to attempt to minimize the damage, effectively assert all relevant causes of action, and ensure that any applicable insurance policies are triggered. Careless or negligent excavation practices have long been the main culprits in these cases, which are disastrous for both the contractor and neighboring family.
In a recent scenario, a Philadelphia family was displaced from their center city row home when negligent excavation, demolition and other construction at the adjacent property rendered their home unsafe. During the relevant period, the defendants' excavator was in conclusive control of the work site. The excavator had run heavy equipment next to the party wall, which loomed three stories high for the entire length of the property bisecting the home and development lot. While this matter resulted in litigation, such could have been avoided by following basic precautions. In an effort to thwart damage to adjoining properties, new laws were enacted in Philadelphia applicable to permit applications involving excavation. These requirements include, but are not limited to, a pre-construction survey, monitoring plan and, importantly, notifications to adjacent owners for specific work scopes that may directly impact the adjacent property. Separate excavation permits, licensure requirements, and increased insurance and bonding are required by the new law and impacts excavation services resulting in cuts, trenches or depressions in the Earth's surface more than five feet below the adjacent grade (for example, basement dig-outs). A link to the new( requirements can be found here: https://www.phila.gov/services/permits-violations-licenses/apply-for-a-permit/building-and-repair-permits/get-an-excavation-site-permit/.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Pa. Supreme Court to Decide Enforceability of 'Browsewrap' Arbitration Agreements Pa. Supreme Court to Decide Enforceability of 'Browsewrap' Arbitration Agreements](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/95/ae/f89a8bc14336b41212b4b02d3326/selmasska-green-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Supreme Court to Decide Enforceability of 'Browsewrap' Arbitration Agreements
8 minute read![From a Mediator’s Perspective: Common Mis-steps That Parties Make at Mediation From a Mediator’s Perspective: Common Mis-steps That Parties Make at Mediation](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/6b/d9/0fdb00614b8b8b2df500dd2d045d/andrew-horowitz-767x633.jpg)
From a Mediator’s Perspective: Common Mis-steps That Parties Make at Mediation
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250