![Theodore J. Zeller III of Norris McLaughlin.](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/08/Theodore-Zeller-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Alcohol Manufacturers Get Lost in the Liquor Code Maze
Manufacturers and regulators should share the same goal of allowing Pennsylvania businesses to safely and efficiently make products that meet the demands of consumers. Yet, transitioning from traditional roles into these new territories is not straightforward.
August 22, 2023 at 10:33 AM
6 minute read
Food and BeverageIn the realm of alcohol production, traditional roles have been well-defined among three categories: distilleries make spirits, breweries brew beer and wineries ferment wine. However, as consumer preferences in Pennsylvania diversify, these roles are blurring. For example, breweries are venturing into mead-making, wineries are experimenting with ciders, and distilleries are expanding their range to include alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages with sodas and infused water.
Manufacturers and regulators should share the same goal of allowing Pennsylvania businesses to safely and efficiently make products that meet the demands of consumers. Yet, transitioning from traditional roles into these new territories is not straightforward. Both Pennsylvania and federal laws create a labyrinth of regulations that producers must navigate. In essence, navigating this maze of laws leaves many well-intentioned producers lost without a clear path to production. Imagine a scenario where a bounty of apples inspires a brewery to produce cider. It sounds simple, right? But the regulatory reality is complicated. While a brewery license in Pennsylvania does authorize the sale of malt or brewed beverage drinks (which does encompass "alcoholic cider and mead" as defined in the Liquor Code), the alcohol content of these beverages must remain between 0.5% and 8.5%. Surpass this, and by the state's classification, the brewery becomes a winery, necessitating an entirely different license. Under 0.5%, you need special permission from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB) to produce products considered nonalcoholic.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/23/32/48b6e7ed401f93d28fc3749c6e06/dominos-pizza-restaurant-06-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash
4 minute read![Lawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods Lawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bd/41/cc0360da428d9a969e7ec52451d0/food-potato-chips-767x633.jpg)
Lawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
3 minute read!['Ice Pop,' 'Meta Moon,' 'Blue Raspberry': Tracked Drink Flavor Searches Fail in Privacy Suit 'Ice Pop,' 'Meta Moon,' 'Blue Raspberry': Tracked Drink Flavor Searches Fail in Privacy Suit](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/403/2023/08/Prime-electrolyte-drink-767x633.jpg)
'Ice Pop,' 'Meta Moon,' 'Blue Raspberry': Tracked Drink Flavor Searches Fail in Privacy Suit
4 minute read![A Vapid Argument on Vaping A Vapid Argument on Vaping](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/10/Benson-Miller-767x633.jpg)
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250