We Cannot Relent: The Need to Remain Resilient in Your Firm's DEI Efforts
The most recent threats to dismantle DEI in the United States are now aimed at the legal industry, but we cannot relent against these attacks and instead must remain resilient with our DEI efforts now and well into the future.
September 28, 2023 at 01:34 PM
9 minute read
As a co-founder of three women-owned businesses, advocating and educating on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in the workplace has been an important part of my career over the last 13 years. Not only is it a passion of mine to help support and amplify underrepresented voices, but from a business owner's standpoint, it becomes a competitive advantage to have as many differing backgrounds and perspectives around the decision-making table. Working in the legal industry gives rise to many challenges when it comes to DEI in our firms and legal departments. Improving inclusion and belonging in the legal industry has not been without setbacks and roadblocks. However, we are now facing a new tidal wave aimed at broadening the distance we have traveled to improve DEI in our industry. In early August, my business partner and colleague, Francine Griesing, wrote an article titled "A Slippery Slope: The Erosion of DEI in the Legal Profession and Beyond" which discussed about three important diversity and inclusion initiatives happening in the United States. Her article focused on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision rendering unlawful use of affirmative action in education admissions decisions, the losses stemming from banned books, and the growing censorship of DEI initiatives—both at the private and public sector levels. As you will read below, the most recent threats to dismantle DEI in the United States are now aimed at the legal industry, but we cannot relent against these attacks and instead must remain resilient with our DEI efforts now and well into the future.
The Attacks on DEI Have Reached New Heights
In the months since affirmative action became unlawful in education admissions, there have been at least three blatant attacks on DEI efforts and initiatives in the private corporate sector— two of which were aimed at Big Law. The first shot set its sights on The Fearless Fund, which "invests in women of color-led businesses seeking pre-seed, seed level or series A financing. Our mission is to bridge the gap in venture capital funding for women of color founders building scalable, growth aggressive companies." For those not familiar, in early August 2023, the American Alliance for Equal Rights (AAER) sued The Fearless Fund, under the guise of—of all things—a discrimination lawsuit. Using a radicalized version of viewpoint diversity, AAER "alleges the grant program excludes some of its members who are not Black women," which is discriminatory and unlawful. The Black Economic Alliance Foundation recently filed an amicus brief in support of The Fearless Fund, which also has the support of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and the National Women's Law Center. While The Fearless Fund did agree to withhold issuances of new grants while the preliminary injunction is decided, Arian Simone, CEO and co-founder of the Fearless Fund declared, "This attack does not change our mission … we will remain steadfast on ensuring that the Fearless Fund will continue to empower women of color entrepreneurs."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanctioned Penn Law Professor Amy Wax Sues University, Alleging Discrimination
5 minute readDisjunctive 'Severe or Pervasive' Standard Applies to Discrimination Claims Against University, Judge Rules
5 minute readNewly Formed DEI Practices Expect Heightened Demand During Trump Administration
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyers: Meet Your New Partner
- 2What Will It Mean in California if New Federal Anti-SLAPP Legislation Passes?
- 3Longtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
- 4Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Stokes Chatter Between Lawyers and Clients
- 5Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250