Colleen McIntyre Osborne Seeks Seat on Philadelphia Municipal Court
"As someone who has been on both sides, I know that a prompt resolution is important to both a complainant and the accused. I will lead my courtroom by example, by being prepared, working hard, and always striving to resolve cases."
October 11, 2023 at 05:17 PM
4 minute read
JudgesEditor's note: Colleen Osborne is a member of the U.S. Army Reserve. Use of her military rank, job titles, and photographs in uniform does not imply endorsement by the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
Candidate: Colleen McIntyre Osborne
Court: Philadelphia Municipal Court
Party: Democrat
Philadelphia Bar Association rating: Recommended
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal Intelligencer: How would you describe your judicial philosophy?
Colleen McIntyre Osborne: I plan to listen to all the facts and apply the law fairly. I will show respect and empathy for every person who walks in the courtroom.
The Legal: What makes you the best candidate for the role?
Osborne: I was a prosecutor for 13 years, with a focus on crimes against women and children. I am also a major in the U.S. Army Reserve, where I previously served as a defense attorney for soldiers. As someone who has been on both sides, I know that a prompt resolution is important to both a complainant and the accused. I will lead my courtroom by example, by being prepared, working hard, and always striving to resolve cases.
The Legal: What is the greatest threat to the practice of law or problem the profession faces?
Osborne: As stewards of our profession, I think we do a great job of being experts in our field and advocating for our clients. I think where we need to work harder is fostering trust that the justice system works. I believe building trust starts with the judge in the room. Not everyone is going to be happy with the outcome, but if each side believes they were given a fair shake, trust is built.
The Legal: What does your party membership say about you and your legal outlook?
Osborne: Neither my legal outlook nor my character is determined by my party membership. I am proud to be a Democrat. I am also proud to be a former prosecutor, former defense attorney, veteran, wife, mother, and Philadelphian.
The Legal: Do you think courts in Pennsylvania have a perception problem when it comes to appearing partisan or polarized? If so, what would you do to combat this?
Osborne: As a practitioner, I have to say, none of my complaints or satisfaction with a particular judge had to do with that person's party affiliation. I wanted a fair judge who worked, and that's what I intend to be and do.
The Legal: Several CLEs and bench-bar panels have recently addressed the growing phenomenon of distrust in the courts. In your view, how has distrust in the judiciary created challenges for the bench, and how should judges respond?
Osborne: Judges should respond by doing their job fairly and efficiently. Philadelphians are not known for being shy—if a judge is being unfair, I am confident they will let us know.
The Legal: What factors matter in deciding when recusal is necessary, and would you recuse yourself if a campaign contributor were involved in litigation as a party or attorney before you?
Osborne: Code of Judicial Conduct, Rule 2.11 governs. Recusal is important even if there is an appearance of impropriety, so the community has trust in the courts. Most of the contributions from individuals to my campaign came from family and friends, so yes, if any campaign contributor were involved in litigation as a party, I would recuse myself because chances are I am related to them or they are a friend of mine. There were a few attorneys from both sides that donated to my campaign. I think that is a testament to my reputation—that both sides believe I will be fair. If an attorney who donated to my campaign comes before me as an attorney, I will certainly let both sides know, and address it appropriately at the time pursuant Rule 2.11. In doing so, I will consider the public perception regarding such contributions and their effect on my ability to be fair and impartial.
The Legal: Who are your role models and mentors?
Osborne: My mother Joan McIntyre is my role model. She has unconditional love for her family, is resilient, and extremely driven. She always told me I could be anything I wanted to be. She also told me quite a few times growing up that, "life's not fair." Being the budding lawyer at a young age she claims I was, my mother jokes that I would reply, "Well, I am going make it fair." If I win in November, I plan to remind her I was right!
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
A New State Law Is a Positive Step Forward for Judicial Security in Pennsylvania—But More Action Is Needed
5 minute readCommentary: Sen. Casey's Critical Role in Keeping Pa. Federal Courts Full
As Appointment Window Narrows, Vacancies on Phila. Court May Linger Until After Primaries
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250