General Election: James J. Eisenhower Runs for Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas
"My four years as a judge on the Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline, the last year as president judge, reinforced my strong belief that ethics and integrity are central to our system of justice."
October 11, 2023 at 01:13 PM
3 minute read
Q&ACandidate: James J. Eisenhower
Court: Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas
Party: Democrat
Philadelphia Bar Association rating: Highly recommended
The following has been edited lightly for length and style.
The Legal Intelligencer: How would you describe your judicial philosophy?
James J. Eisenhower: Equal justice under law.
The Legal: What makes you the best candidate for the role?
Eisenhower: I was awarded the "highly recommended" rating from the Philadelphia Bar Association. I believe that my experience as president judge of the Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline, federal prosecutor with the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, assistant U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, big-firm lawyer practicing criminal law and high-stakes civil litigation, law professor and as chairman of the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency and the Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority board gives me a well-rounded and unique set of skills to bring to the bench.
The Legal: What is the greatest threat to the practice of law or problem the profession faces?
Eisenhower: If the public loses confidence in the impartiality and incorruptibility of our courts, then our system cannot function. Those of us who make up the justice system, be they attorneys, staff or judges, must do their best to adhere to the highest standards of ethics and justice.
The Legal: What does your party membership say about you and your legal outlook?
Eisenhower: I am a candidate of the Democratic Party. Despite my famous Republican last name, I am proud of the Democratic Party's progressive and forward-looking history. If I am elected, however, party politics will never be a factor in any decision I will render.
The Legal: Do you think courts in Pennsylvania have a perception problem when it comes to appearing partisan or polarized? If so, what would you do to combat this?
Eisenhower: My four years as a judge on the Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline, the last year as president judge, reinforced my strong belief that ethics and integrity are central to our system of justice.
The Legal: Several CLEs and bench-bar panels have recently addressed the growing phenomenon of distrust in the courts. In your view, how has distrust in the judiciary created challenges for the bench, and how should judges respond?
Eisenhower: See above answers.
The Legal: What factors matter in deciding when recusal is necessary, and would you recuse yourself if a campaign contributor were involved in litigation as a party or attorney before you?
Eisenhower: I will consider recusal on a case-by-case basis, following the Pennsylvania Constitution, the Code of Judicial Conduct and other relevant guidance.
The Legal: Who are your role models and mentors?
Eisenhower: I have been privileged to have had a number of mentors and role models in my career. Among the most important were [Superior Court] Judge J. Sydney Hoffman, for whom I clerked; Barry Kowalski, civil rights lawyer and law professor; Linda Davis, my first boss at the Department of Justice; and Ronald Dworkin, one of my graduate school professors. All of them had a passion for justice, love of the law, personal ethics, civility and empathy. My father, who passed away earlier this year, was an Army veteran (Third Infantry Division), postman and small businessman. Among my earliest memories are his urging us as children to treat every person with respect. Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King was a hero in our family. Dr. King continues to serve as a role model for me.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMatt's Corner: Court of Judicial Discipline-Presumed Prejudicial Delay
3 minute readEthical Considerations in Representing an Organizational Client and Its Constituents
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 2Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
- 3To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
- 4Merchan Rejects Trump's Bid to Delay Manhattan Sentencing
- 5High-Low Settlement Agreement 'Does Not Alone Establish Bias:' State High Court Affirms $20M Med Mal Verdict
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250