The Pennsylvania Superior Court held in Coryell v. Morris, 2023 PA Super 232 (2023) that as a matter of law, vicarious liability would not be extended to franchisor Domino’s Pizza for a tragic collision between a delivery driver of the franchisee and a motorcyclist. Although the jury awarded $2,109,553 to Clarence Coryell and his wife, Sandra, and against Domino’s for vicarious liability, the Superior Court reversed and remanded with instructions that Domino’s was not vicariously liable. The case is required reading on the law of vicarious liability for franchise businesses.

The case reinforces the law in Pennsylvania that a mere independent contractor relationship is insufficient to impose vicarious liability. The court affirmed that vicarious liability only attaches in a business relationship where the master “controls not only the result of the work but also has the right to direct the manner in which the work shall be accomplished.” The language of the franchise agreement featured prominently in its disposition.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]