Rich Lee, left, of New Era ADR and Seamus Duffy, right, of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. Courtesy photos ADR
This month, I was honored to interview Seamus Duffy, a "bet-the-company" litigator who played an early role in the matter that led to a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding arbitration. Duffy, then with Drinker, Biddle & Reath (now Faegre, Drinker, Biddle & Reath), represented AT&T Mobility in lower court proceedings that led to the high court's 2011 ruling in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion. The 5-4 court majority struck down a California law that banned arbitration agreements that would disallow class actions, holding that such laws were preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925.Resolving Litigation: Arbitration and Mediation After 'Concepcion'
Seamus Duffy explained how arbitration law has evolved from before the Concepcion decision to the world of mass arbitrations today.
February 23, 2024 at 11:38 AM
10 minute read
Rich Lee, left, of New Era ADR and Seamus Duffy, right, of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. Courtesy photos
ADR
This month, I was honored to interview Seamus Duffy, a "bet-the-company" litigator who played an early role in the matter that led to a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding arbitration. Duffy, then with Drinker, Biddle & Reath (now Faegre, Drinker, Biddle & Reath), represented AT&T Mobility in lower court proceedings that led to the high court's 2011 ruling in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion. The 5-4 court majority struck down a California law that banned arbitration agreements that would disallow class actions, holding that such laws were preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Resolving Litigation: Wells Fargo Counsel Discusses His Legal Journey and Approach to Disputes
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Luigi Mangione Indicted in Federal Court for Stalking, Murder and Firearms Offenses
- 2Biggest Legal Tech People Moves of 2024
- 3NY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
- 4Preparing for 2025: Anticipated Policy Changes Affecting U.S. Businesses Under the Trump Administration
- 5High Court May Limit the Reach of the Wire Fraud Statute
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
