In a post-trial hearing over a $976 million defective seatbelt verdict, Kline & Specter partner Charles Becker contended Tuesday that the defense’s primary challenge was “a lot, essentially, of nothing.”
Defendant Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc. argued that the court should order a new trial in Amagasu v. Fred Beans Family of Dealerships because the jury had not been given a proper instruction on crashworthiness before deliberation.
![Charles Becker](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/09/Charles-Becker-Vert-202309221201.jpg)