Legal Lifelines: Advocating for Philadelphian Families Through the Law
Our clients remind us of what justice and equality looks like for real individuals, outside the theoretical ideals described in laws and textbooks.
May 13, 2024 at 12:27 PM
3 minute read
As attorney fellows in the family law unit at Philadelphia Legal Assistance, we provide free legal services to low-income Philadelphians in protection from abuse (PFA) and custody matters. Our fellowships each involve different substantive legal areas. Our respective overlapping areas include families with DHS/dependency court involvement, pending criminal offenses and housing insecurity. We see how these obstacles overlap with PFA and custody cases, causing ripple effects in our clients' lives. We attorneys know it is extremely taxing for people to keep up with one case, let alone several different cases in different areas of law, all at once. Our clients have a PFA and custody to navigate while also facing other systemic injustices daily. We are driven by a deep sense of duty to advocate for those most vulnerable and to amplify their voices in a system that often seems immovable. Our clients remind us of what justice and equality looks like for real individuals, outside the theoretical ideals described in laws and textbooks.
Our clients are your neighbors, your local grocery store clerk or your child's teacher. They are members of our Philadelphia community. They work full-time or care for children and family members full-time. Sometimes, they do both. They attend parent-teacher conferences and IEP meetings. They worry about whether they will be able to make rent this month. They help their children with homework. They make sure that their children are safe and taken care of every single day. They co-parent and make important decisions about their children's welfare, many times with their abusers, to comply with custody orders. They are concerned about minimizing the effects of this volatility and trauma on their children and preserving any semblance of innocence among overwhelming adversity. They miss work (and pay!) for numerous court listings—as a victim complainant in criminal court, in their custody proceedings, in their protection from abuse matters, in their child support matters to increase their income to better care for their children. Sometimes, their abusers bring them back to court again and again for frivolous reasons. There are parking fees, childcare expenses and no pay for missing work.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDefendant in Protection From Abuse Case Has Standing to File for Contempt
6 minute read$8M Settlement Reached in Wrongful Death, Negligence Suits Against Phila. Foster Agency
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Being a Profession is Not Malarkey
- 2Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open
- 3High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement
- 4Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys
- 5Selling Law. How to Get Hired, Paid and Rehired
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250