![Jennifer Budd of Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman. Courtesy photo](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/07/Jennifer-Budd-767x633.jpg)
New Horizons for DBEs: Understanding the Latest USDOT Regulatory Changes
Since the IIJA encourages the expanded use of design-build contracts, the rule prevents these projects from evading DBE participation obligations. Under the rule, design-builders submitting proposals on projects funded by the IIJA (or other applicable funding sources) must include a DBE performance plan. The contracting entities must monitor "good faith efforts" to comply with the plan and schedule.
August 13, 2024 at 08:00 AM
7 minute read
Special SectionsWhen approaching a presidential election, regardless of who is in the White House, many regulations are finalized in the spring before the election. This is done to avoid the "look back" period of the Congressional Review Act, which allows the next congress and president to invalidate regulations passed later in the election year. This spring was no different, and the administration finalized many regulations, including a highly anticipated final rule from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) on Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE).
The new DBE rule (49 CFR 23, 49 CFR 26) arose, in part, from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 (IIJA), more colloquially known as the bi-partisan infrastructure bill. The IIJA, in addition to reauthorizing the DBE program, included many directives pertaining to administration of the DBE program. Regulations were necessary to enact the statutory directives. Further, because DBE obligations flow down to recipients of IIJA funds, such as states and municipalities, those receiving IIJA funds needed to understand how they should implement and apply the IIJA provisions applicable to DBEs.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Pa. Supreme Court to Decide Enforceability of 'Browsewrap' Arbitration Agreements Pa. Supreme Court to Decide Enforceability of 'Browsewrap' Arbitration Agreements](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/95/ae/f89a8bc14336b41212b4b02d3326/selmasska-green-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Supreme Court to Decide Enforceability of 'Browsewrap' Arbitration Agreements
8 minute read![From a Mediator’s Perspective: Common Mis-steps That Parties Make at Mediation From a Mediator’s Perspective: Common Mis-steps That Parties Make at Mediation](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/6b/d9/0fdb00614b8b8b2df500dd2d045d/andrew-horowitz-767x633.jpg)
From a Mediator’s Perspective: Common Mis-steps That Parties Make at Mediation
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.