'Regular Use Exclusions' Stand: Pa. Supreme Court's Latest Ruling Post-'Gallagher'
After the Pennsylvania Superior Court determined in 2021 that "regular use exclusions" in UM/UIM policies violate the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), and in a post-Gallagher legal landscape, some were ready to put the regular use exclusion to rest for good. Now, however, in Rush v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 308 A.3d 780 (Pa. Jan. 29, 2024), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a lengthy majority opinion, has confirmed that the regular use exclusion remains very much alive.
August 20, 2024 at 08:00 AM
7 minute read
Special SectionsAfter the Pennsylvania Superior Court determined in 2021 that "regular use exclusions" in UM/UIM policies violate the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), and in a post-Gallagher legal landscape, some were ready to put the regular use exclusion to rest for good. Now, however, in Rush v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 308 A.3d 780 (Pa. Jan. 29, 2024), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a lengthy majority opinion, has confirmed that the regular use exclusion remains very much alive.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFifth Circuit Sides With Fourth Circuit and Rules That Discharge Exceptions Apply to Corporate Subchapter V Debtors
7 minute readOne Word May Make All the Difference for Lifers Convicted of Felony Murder
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 2'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 4NYC Mayor Eric Adams Indicted on Public Corruption Allegations
- 5What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers