Federal Judge Tosses Uber's 'Creative' Bid to Compel Arbitration of Employee's Claims
Murphy held that "compelling arbitration in the present action could impair the PHRC's interest in investigating future charges of discrimination filed by individuals who are subject to an arbitration clause."
August 27, 2024 at 02:48 PM
3 minute read
Employment LawWhat You Need to Know
- A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit from Uber seeking to compel arbitration of a former employee's pending claims before the PHRA.
- The judge ruled that Uber could not use the arbitration agreement as a tool to stop the PHRC's investigation.
- He ruled that compelling arbitration would impair the PHRC's interest in investigating some future discrimination charges.
An attempt from Uber to evade an employment discrimination investigation, while "creative," did not pass legal muster, a federal judge ruled.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 5'You Are Not Alone': 120 Sex Assault Victims Plan to Sue Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250