With Malpractice Funds Shrinking, Eckert Seamans Brokers New Settlement in Par Funding Case
A previous $45 million settlement has been negotiated down to $38 million, the balance of the firm's "eroding" insurance limits.
October 21, 2024 at 12:58 PM
3 minute read
What You Need to Know
- Following mediation, Eckert Seamans is one step closer to finalizing a new settlement for its former partner's role in counseling Par Funding, a cash advance company turned Ponzi scheme that defrauded investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- The firm previously arranged a $45 million settlement earlier in the year with the Par Funding receivership, although the Supreme Court's decision casting doubt on the validity of bar orders preventing further litigation threw a wrench into that proposed settlement.
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott is inching closer to a $38 million universal settlement for its former partner's role in counseling Par Funding, a Philadelphia-based cash advance company designated a Ponzi scheme that defrauded investors of hundreds of millions of dollars, after months of infighting among those looking to sue the firm took a toll upon its once $50 million insurance policy.
According to a status report filed Oct. 18 in Florida federal court, the court-appointed receiver, led by Ryan K. Stumphauzer and Timothy Kolaya of Stumphauzer Kolaya Nadler & Sloman and aided by Gaetan Alfano of Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, has reached a master settlement agreement as part of a larger goal to make investors whole, involving Eckert Seamans and three groups of objectors who blocked previous attempts to confirm a $45 million settlement with the firm.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-DLA Piper, Ballard Spahr Atty Accused of Aiding Video Game Company Founder's Misappropriation Scheme
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250