If You Are Too 'Busy' to Communicate With Your Client, You Better Think Again
Clients that are unversed in litigation may have difficulty understanding why their case is "not moving" or "taking so long." Lawyers facing these types of questions cannot simply ignore the client's requests for updates.
October 23, 2024 at 12:18 PM
5 minute read
EthicsWhen it comes to litigation, much of the practice is designated to communications with opposing counsel, co-counsel, a mediator, a court and, of course, a jury. In my experience, lawyers rarely find themselves in the crosshairs of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel for alleged shortcomings concerning their lack of communicative efforts in those settings. Court-mandated deadlines largely force lawyers to timely communicate with their adversaries and the court. However, these same deadlines can, at times, cause lawyers to overlook, or worse, ignore, certain important tenets: the duty to keep clients reasonably informed about the status of their case, to "promptly comply with reasonable requests for information" and to ensure that clients are positioned to make informed decisions concerning the representation. See Pa. R.P.C. 1.4. It is easy to imagine a situation where a lawyer is working under an impending deadline in one matter when a case update request arrives from a client in an unrelated matter. It is also easy to imagine that, in such a scenario, the lawyer overlooks (or ignores) the update request. Doing so may ultimately trigger the ignored client to file a complaint with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and, in my experience, Disciplinary Counsel does not treat these types of complaints lightly, especially if it is shown that the lawyer has engaged in a pattern of snubbing clients' update requests. Certain best practices can help lawyers protect themselves against this type of risk.
The predominance of e-filing, at least in theory, should assist lawyers in keeping clients reasonably informed about the status of their cases. As part of a lawyer's internal operating procedures, a lawyer would be well advised to have a person within the office specifically designated to forward clients all e-filed documents upon receipt. This can be accomplished with a few mouse clicks and should help ensure the client is kept informed about the status of the case, while at the same time potentially reduce the frequency that a client may submit the lawyer update requests.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAvoiding Conflict When Relating Advice to an Adverse Party to Facilitate a Client Matter
4 minute readMatt's Corner: Pa.R.D.E. 217—Obligations of a Formerly Admitted Attorney
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 2Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 3Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
- 4Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
- 5Am Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250