Antitrust Agencies Finalize Overhaul of Merger Review Process: What Can You Do to Prepare for the New HSR Regime?
On Oct.10, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted unanimously to issue a final rule amending the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) form and…
November 04, 2024 at 11:20 AM
16 minute read
![(l-r) Michelle A. Mantine, Christopher R. Brennan, and Edward B. Schwartz of Reed Smith. Courtesy photos](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/10/Martine-Brennan-Schwartz-767x633.jpg)
On Oct.10, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted unanimously to issue a final rule amending the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) form and instructions and the premerger notification rules implementing the HSR Act. The same day, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ and, together with the FTC, the agencies) issued a press release concurring with the FTC's changes to the premerger notification form used in merger review. The final rule—the first amendment to the HSR form and instructions in over 46 years—is the culmination of the agencies' long-standing effort to dramatically overhaul the requirements for merging entities.
The final rule is a mixed bag. The changes will impose significant additional burdens on filing parties by mandating that they disclose broad tranches of information about overlapping business lines, investors, areas of future competition and prior acquisitions, among others. The agencies estimate that the HSR preparation time under the final rule will increase by an average of 68 hours and up to approximately 120 hours, depending on the scope and nature of the transaction. Fortunately for buyers and sellers, the agencies have abandoned or substantially modified a number of earlier proposals—most notably by scuttling a proposal that would have required filing parties submit all drafts of competitive analysis documents, as well as onerous requirements designed to evaluate competitive impacts on labor markets.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Cozen O'Connor's Bernard Nash Pioneered the Modern State AGs Practice. Now He's Hanging Up His Boots Cozen O'Connor's Bernard Nash Pioneered the Modern State AGs Practice. Now He's Hanging Up His Boots](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/fb/8a/824b62d848c3a0021a5601fcd72f/bernie-nash-767x633.jpg)
Cozen O'Connor's Bernard Nash Pioneered the Modern State AGs Practice. Now He's Hanging Up His Boots
6 minute read![What to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development What to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bf/42/d49fd0c943a9aa57a1a0e70d5f54/adobestock-627472893-767x633.jpg)
What to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute read![Bondi and Big Tech: What Trump's Choice for US AG Could Mean for Antitrust Enforcement Bondi and Big Tech: What Trump's Choice for US AG Could Mean for Antitrust Enforcement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/05/Hittinger-Martin-767x633-1-1.jpg)
Bondi and Big Tech: What Trump's Choice for US AG Could Mean for Antitrust Enforcement
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250