Frontier Airlines aircraft Airbus A320-251N approaching the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport on May 26, 2024. Credit: leekris/Adobe StockPassenger Sues Frontier Airlines for Burns Sustained From In-Flight Beverage
The plaintiff, a Philadelphia resident, was flying home when he requested a cup of hot tea, which was served in a "highly negligent fashion."
November 12, 2024 at 06:14 PM
3 minute read
Civil Procedure
Frontier Airlines was slapped with a personal injury lawsuit stemming from allegations that a passenger sustained third-degree burns after a cup of tea fell onto his lap.
This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just-filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Sign up today and be among the first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.
The Nov. 10 complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by the Barrist Firm on behalf of Sean Miller, who claims to have sustained third-degree burns after a cup of tea he requested during cabin service burned his thighs and genitalia while traveling from Myrtle Beach to Philadelphia.
Miller, a Philadelphia resident, was flying home when he requested and was served hot tea. He claims the beverage was given to him in a "highly negligent fashion, filled to the brim, at an unsafely and unreasonably high temperature and without any form of a lid."
According to the complaint, the hot water spilled between Miller's legs, through his clothing, and onto his genitalia. As he was in a tightly situated airplane seat, he claims that after the spill he sat in agony while his body was burned. Miller was met on the ground in Philadelphia by an ambulance that took him to Jefferson Methodist Hospital, before he was transferred to the Jefferson University Hospital Burn Center.
As a result of the spill, Miller allegedly sustained burns and was left with disfiguring scars on his genitalia and thighs. The complaint brings claims for negligence and requests $150,000 in judgment, as well as costs and fees.
"Despite multiple letters sent to Frontier Airlines via FedEx overnight courier, I have received no communication, of any kind, back from Frontier Airlines, concerning, among other issues, the payment of my client’s past medical bills and payment for his ongoing treatment. It was, therefore, necessary to institute suit right away," said Miller's attorney, Adam S. Barrist of the Barrist Firm, in Media, Pennsylvania.
Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. Frontier Airlines did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute read
Slip-and-Fall Suit Cleared to Proceed Against Kalahari Indoor Waterpark
3 minute read
Civil RICO's Expanding Reach: From Foreign Schemes to Lost Employment
7 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 2The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 3Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 4Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 5Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
