Rising Litigation Fees: What Is the Cause?
Members of the litigation bar are aware of the rising hourly rate for major law firm partners; however, even experienced trial partners in the bar are somewhat shocked at the new rates. So are the clients, who continue to pay them.
November 12, 2024 at 12:03 PM
4 minute read
Law partners are charging $2,000/hour and $1,000/hour for associates. Recent law school graduates with no experience are starting at $200,000/year. These figures are not from a novel about what the new Great Gatsby era might look like; they are real numbers in an article in the Oct. 5, 2024, edition of the Wall Street Journal about litigation managed by major law firms in the United States. Members of the litigation bar are aware of the rising hourly rate for major law firm partners; however, even experienced trial partners in the bar are somewhat shocked at the new rates. So are the clients, who continue to pay them.
An appropriate question is how this billing practice is affecting the bar, firm management committees, new law school graduates and potential clients. Take a step back and view the law profession from the position of middle America business owners, family members and new law school graduates.
An easy answer is that this billing practice only affects a very small portion of the bar who have clients who can pass the costs onto their corporate shareholders. But this large hourly rate movement has been expanding nationwide for several years, especially as the result of the many law firm mergers. The Wall Street Journal article cites a 9% legal fee rise in legal fee costs in the first half of 2024, compared to an 8, 3% last year. Some very experienced trial lawyers have confided that they are planning to leave their firms as they cannot charge the hourly rate required by the new procedures set by the firms after mergers. This is especially true with experienced criminal lawyers who are a mainstay of the bar. A great many clients are not corporations who can pass the costs to the shareholders.
Recently there has been a movement in the bar to bring more professional leadership training into the operation of law firms, such as training in management and client development skills, rather than promoting those persons who can bill the most hours. See Vaira, "Leadership Training for Lawyers Is Time Well Spent," Legal Intelligencer, March 6, 2023. This is a positive step in the right direction. My alma mater, Thomas R. Kline School of Law of Duquesne University, offers a full semester class in leadership, which is taught by persons from commercial business firms, the military and law firms. It is very popular with the students and has caught the attention of the bar. Large commercial corporations offer leadership training to their personnel in the field; however, very few law firms offer any leadership training. A good law firm management program can help control the billing rates of the firm.
Commentators of the legal profession have observed that some of the reasons for the rising rates are the client corporations who do not shop the market. The WSJ article cites Heineken general counsel who said, “You can get the same quality (of representation) for half the price.”
A new factor in this equation is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in legal research by the law firms. A great deal of nuts-and-bolts legal work can be drastically reduced by the use of AI. How this is going to work out is going to be a study of technique and legal ethics. I predict that AI skills will become a legal specialty of certain firms.
A major factor that must be considered by law firms, clients, educators, and bar associations, is how this high priced hourly rate will affect new law graduates who must make a choice of what area of the law to pursue, in addition to considering how much of a salary they can obtain. Some niche disciplines, necessary for law practice of family law or small business administration, are not offered by many large law firms, as they do not require mass billing sessions.
There are no quick answers to the growing hourly rates for law firm partners and associates. The issue requires attention by law firm leadership, bar associations, educators, and the business community who pays the bills. I suggest the Philadelphia Bar Association create a “leadership committee” with members from law firms, in house counsel, educators and experienced trial lawyers.
Peter Vaira is a member of Weir LLP. He is a former U.S. attorney and the author of a book on Eastern District practice. He acts as special hearing master for Pennsylvania courts and clients. He can be reached at [email protected].
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
With Chair Regularly on the Road, Duane Morris Names First Phila. Office Managing Partner
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 2Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 3African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 4Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 5Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250