Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
While the lawsuit is new, Terrance DeAngelo's claims echo many of the allegations made against Kline & Specter in the firm’s heated dispute with another of its former associates, Thomas Bosworth.
November 13, 2024 at 07:17 PM
4 minute read
What You Need to Know
- Ex-Kline & Specter associate Terrance DeAngelo sued his former firm Tuesday.
- DeAngelo claimed the firm harassed him when he tried to resign and interfered with his client relations.
- DeAngelo's lawsuit stems from the firm's dispute with Thomas Bosworth, and makes a similar challenge to the firm's employment agreement.
Another ex-Kline & Specter attorney is mounting a legal fight against his former firm.
Terrance DeAngelo, who resigned from Kline & Specter in September and now heads TR DeAngelo Law, filed a complaint Tuesday accusing his former employer of threatening attorneys who try to leave the firm and interfering with departing lawyers’ client relations.
And while the lawsuit is new, DeAngelo's claims echo many of the allegations made against Kline & Specter in the firm’s heated dispute with another of its former associates, Thomas Bosworth. In fact, the litigation between Kline & Specter and Bosworth was heavily referenced in DeAngelo's 30-page complaint. DeAngelo alleged in the lawsuit that the firm and its leaders mistreated him and reduced his caseload because of his ongoing friendship with Bosworth.
DeAngelo claimed in the lawsuit that, after Kline & Specter fired Bosworth, the firm and its founding attorneys Thomas Kline and Shanin Specter allegedly “mistreated DeAngelo, stripped him of cases, threatened him, and, through their counsel, tried to dissuade DeAngelo from testifying truthfully at his deposition in the Bosworth/K&S litigation.”
Lamb McErlane partner Joseph Podraza Jr., who represents the defendants, called the lawsuit “sad and meritless" and noted that DeAngelo and Bosworth are friends.
“This copycat filing predictably will meet the same fate as the lawsuit filed by Mr. Bosworth,” Podraza contended in an email.
Bosworth and Kline & Specter reached a settlement in August, cutting off what had been an expansive legal fight. And DeAngelo’s lawsuit mirrors some of the claims Bosworth made over the course of the litigation.
Both lawyers alleged in lawsuits that Kline & Specter improperly sought to dissuade clients from following them to their new practices. They also both claimed in legal filings that Kline & Specter refused to transfer client files to them following their moves.
And both Bosworth and DeAngelo claimed Kline & Specter’s employment agreement was unenforceable.
DeAngelo, in the complaint, specifically took aim at two clauses in the firm's employment agreement: one requiring a departing lawyer to reimburse Kline & Specter for costs associated with any clients who elect to follow the attorney, and one dictating that a departing lawyer must wait to contact clients until after Kline & Specter has already done so.
Advancing a similar argument that Bosworth had once made, DeAngelo argued in the complaint that those clauses go against public policy and ethics rules about attorneys’ obligations to clients when a lawyer changes firms.
In the weeks leading up to the initiation of his lawsuit, DeAngelo had made similar assertions in petitions across several actions asking for court intervention to compel Kline & Specter to turn over client files.
In his Tuesday complaint, DeAngelo asked the court for a declaratory ruling that the employment agreement is invalid and unenforceable. He also alleged in the lawsuit claims of breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and tortious interference with existing and prospective business relations.
“Kline and Specter act as if the rules and law don’t apply to them,” DeAngelo's attorney, Alexandria Crouthamel of Crouthamel Law Offices in Bethlehem, claimed in an email. “Apparently," she added, "Kline and Specter did not engage in any self-reflection following their litigation with Mr. Bosworth."
DeAngelo, in the complaint, cited an instance in which a Philadelphia judge told Kline & Specter it could not hold “hostage” the files of one of Bosworth’s clients and ordered the firm to transfer them to Bosworth.
However, when Bosworth later challenged Kline & Specter’s employment agreement as unethical, another judge ruled the agreement was valid and enforceable.
Crouthamel asserted that DeAngelo’s challenge hinges on different legal issues from those involved in the Bosworth litigation because DeAngelo left Kline & Specter through a resignation rather than a firing. "Regardless," she contended, "the employment agreement is violative of numerous ethics rules."
DeAngelo's lawsuit comes when tensions appear to be reignited in the Bosworth litigation after several months of quiet. DeAngelo filed this complaint about a week after Kline & Specter accused Bosworth of failing to comply with the terms of his settlement with the firm.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View AllMatt's Corner: Pa.R.D.E. 217—Obligations of a Formerly Admitted Attorney
2 minute readMatt's Corner: Contributory Negligence Can Be a Bar to Legal Malpractice Recovery
2 minute readMatt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250