The Crypto Guys Seem to Like Paul Atkins as a New SEC Commissioner, but Will He Be Good for the Securities Industry?
It is well known that Atkins was the founder of Patomak Global Partners, a firm that consulted to the securities industry and other market participants. Indeed, the digital asset and crypto community has been supportive of the pick in large measure because the chair nominee has been a vocal supporter of innovation and crypto.
December 27, 2024 at 10:22 AM
6 minute read
One hallmark of the Gensler SEC was to regulate through enforcement, particularly in cases where there may have been no explicit governing rules. That approach raised understandable resistance from the securities industry specifically and the business community more broadly. Not surprisingly, President-Elect Donald Trump’s nomination of Paul Atkins to replace Chairman Gary Gensler was met with applause by the broader business community, in part, with the hope that the new chairman will take a less hostile approach than his predecessor. It is well known that Atkins was the founder of Patomak Global Partners, a firm that consulted to the securities industry and other market participants. Indeed, the digital asset and crypto community has been supportive of the pick in large measure because the chair nominee has been a vocal supporter of innovation and crypto.
But how “friendly” will Atkins actually be toward the securities industry? His public statements since he left the SEC in 2008, when he finished his term as a commissioner, provide clues.
- Why not simpler, easier-to-understand regulations?
The chair nominee has broadly criticized the burdens the SEC imposes in requests for information in enforcement cases and more broadly on public companies “in the normal course.” Perhaps rhetorically, he challenged a panel of current SEC staff to answer “just how are you effectively using this information, this wealth of information” and how heightened disclosure requirements “advance the mission of the SEC?” He has also specifically criticized the Dodd-Frank Act (passed in response to the 2008 financial crisis) for implementing a number of required public company disclosures. Examples he has used include CEO pay ratios, which was something that was considered by some to be at the core of Dodd-Frank at the time it was passed. He commented that some disclosure requirements “place real burdens on public companies and their shareholders who ultimately pay the costs of making these immaterial disclosures that provide no benefit to economically-driven investors.”
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions
10 minute read'Training to Replace Yourself': Kessler Topaz Co-Founder Set to Retire
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1M&A Transactions and AB 1824: Navigating New Privacy Compliance Challenges
- 2Devin Nunes, Former California GOP Congressman, Loses Move to Revive Defamation Suit
- 3Judge Sides With Retail Display Company in Patent Dispute Against Campbell Soup, Grocery Stores
- 4Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 5Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250