![](https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/8f/0d/9830864b4091be74cb5ce64e2fce/nick-lowrey-767x633.jpg)
Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
On Jan. 29, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled "Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism." The order reaffirms and builds upon Executive Order 13899, a December 2019 order signed by Trump during his first term with the stated purpose of “combating the rise of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incidence in the United States and around the world.” This new order may have important implications for academic institutions and for international students in the United States.
February 07, 2025 at 12:00 PM
6 minute read
International students and other temporary visa holders are concerned about new immigration policies that may impact and undercut their immigration statuses in the United States. Some of these new policies include language regarding the revocation of visa and even the removal of foreign nationals from the United States that may have violated those new policies. These policies raise several questions. Can the president and the U.S. immigration agencies revoke visas and remove foreign nationals for violations that may have taken place prior to the new policy’s implementation? How would such a policy even be implemented? Will there be arguments these students can make to prevent their loss of status or removal from the United States?
On Jan. 29, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled "Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism." The order reaffirms and builds upon Executive Order 13899, a December 2019 order signed by Trump during his first term with the stated purpose of “combating the rise of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incidence in the United States and around the world.” This new order may have important implications for academic institutions and for international students in the United States. The order raises particular concerns for international students who have previously participated in on- or off-campus political demonstrations against Israel’s response to the Oct. 7 attacks by Hamas. The White House fact sheet on the new executive order describes the intent of the order: to protect the rights of Jewish citizens; to aggressively enforce the law, protect public order, and prosecute anti-Semitic crimes; and to revoke the student visas of Hamas sympathizers and deport them.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![EB-5 Immigration Investor Program: a Win-Win Program, or Is It? EB-5 Immigration Investor Program: a Win-Win Program, or Is It?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/01/Kyle-Garabedian-767x633.jpg)
![Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business? Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c6/09/887e18ff42bda2b42ebaaf3e0681/immigration-ice-detention-3-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute read![The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/04/41/7d4ee3034009b995b2795f6ee611/generations-2-767x633.jpg)
The New Trump Worksite Enforcement Paradigm: Everything You Need to Know
14 minute read![EB-5 Rebounds After a Rocky Year: Challenges of 2024 Lay Groundwork for a Booming 2025 EB-5 Rebounds After a Rocky Year: Challenges of 2024 Lay Groundwork for a Booming 2025](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/d2/e0/669ec6734d1997dc3185ea3f5f50/jill-jones-767x633-1.jpg)
EB-5 Rebounds After a Rocky Year: Challenges of 2024 Lay Groundwork for a Booming 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Landlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules
- 2Compliance with EU AI Act Lags Behind As First Provisions Take Effect
- 3NJ's Pardons and Commutations A Model for the Federal System
- 4As Political Retribution Intensifies, Look to Navalny's Lawyers
- 5Family Law Practitioners Weigh In on Court System's New Joint Divorce Program
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.