A Philadelphia judge has asked an appeals court to uphold a decision granting a new trial in one of Philadelphia Common Pleas Court’s hormone replacement therapy test cases because a plaintiffs’ expert said during a deposition in another Minnesota HRT case that he’d changed his opinion about what caused the plaintiff’s breast cancer.
Philadelphia Common Pleas Judge Allan L. Tereshko said in a Sept. 24 opinion that the Superior Court should uphold the trial decision in Daniel v. Wyeth vacating a $1.68 million compensatory damages award and ordering a new trial.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
