Because petitioner provided good cause for the late filing of his answer to a findings report and because the opposing party suffered no prejudice, petitioner was entitled to file a nunc pro tunc answer to the investigative complaint against him. Vacated and remanded.
November 17, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Eathorne v. State Ethics Comm’n, PICS Case No. 08-1864 (Pa. Commw. Nov. 7, 2008) Pellegrini, J. (10 pages).
Because petitioner provided good cause for the late filing of his answer to a findings report and because the opposing party suffered no prejudice, petitioner was entitled to file a nunc pro tunc answer to the investigative complaint against him. Vacated and remanded.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Mineola defense firm seeks attorneys with 3-5 years of actual insurance defense experience to handle complex general liability matters. Sala...
Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, NJ is seeking an Experienced Commercial Real Estate/Transactional Attorney for a full-time position. ...
Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey is seeking a Litigation Associate NJ Bar admission required. NY admission a plus but is no...
