A three-judge Superior Court panel has upheld a $4 million verdict against trustees of the University of Pennsylvania in a breach of contract case and ruled the plaintiff, a former head of pediatric dentistry at the school, was not entitled to prejudgment interest.
The Superior Court found no support for an entrance of judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court dismissed Penn’s argument that an offer letter, which happened to lay out fee arrangements between the school and the plaintiff — who would help run a dental clinic — could not be construed as a contract.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
