The state Superior Court has ruled that an insurer has the duty to cover part of an insured’s payment to settle a federal civil RICO cause of action, even as it explicitly excluded coverage for a breach of contract lawsuit.
In so holding, the appeals court reversed a Philadelphia judge’s ruling that the insurer — which was the carrier for a business professional liability policy — had no duty to provide coverage for the civil RICO settlement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
