The recent U.S. Supreme Court term ended in a flood of cases on topics that captured the public imagination: searching teenage girls; race discrimination in firefighter examinations and DNA testing.
A case, lost amid the clamor, addressed a more prosaic subject — Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) — but carries with it the seeds for far-reaching and harmful consequences for advocates and their public interest lawyers, like those who work at the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, who sue to enforce federal law against state officials.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
