Over the recent weeks and months, much has been said and written about the perceived diversity among the justices on the U.S. Supreme Court. By some measuring sticks — for example, ideology, gender, race and age — the court is slowly becoming more diverse, especially when compared to past courts.
Viewed from a different vantage point — that of experiential diversity — we question whether the court is really all that diverse, and we wonder whether society should expand its definition or expectation of “diversity” when talking about the makeup of the Supreme Court.
Why Diversity Might Matter
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
