To get even the briefest sense of the issues at the core of Schmidt v. Boardman , one only needed to stick around for a few minutes Tuesday during the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s oral arguments session in Pittsburgh.
Chief Justice Ronald D. Castille provided a synopsis of the facts in the case, noting that the strict liability case, brought under the products line exception, stemmed from a fire truck “manufactured by the appellant,” meaning Sinor/FSV.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
