The Superior Court recently addressed a child support issue of first impression – whether a court may deviate downward from the support guidelines based on the fact that the child lives in a “third world” country where the standard of living is much lower than that of the United States. In Nischal v. Nischal,879 A.2d 813 (Pa. Super. 2005), the appeals court rejected this argument, and held that it would be improper to apply a downward departure from the guidelines based upon a lower standard of living of the country where the child resides.

In Nischal,the mother and father were married and resided in India until the father moved to the United States in 2001. The mother remained in India and never came to the United States. The father originally came to the United States on “recreation,” but later began employment requiring him to stay in the country indefinitely and change his immigration status. After Sept. 11, 2001, the immigration procedures governing the father’s immigration status changed, prohibiting him from returning to India.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]