Addressing consolidated appeals from the denial of PCRA petitions, the Superior Court held that petitioners were not entitled to relief because the after-discovered evidence upon which they relied would not have compelled a different result at any of the trials. Affirmed.
October 26, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Soto, PICS Case No. 09-1748 (Pa. Super. Oct. 16, 2009) Klein, J. (11 pages).
Addressing consolidated appeals from the denial of PCRA petitions, the Superior Court held that petitioners were not entitled to relief because the after-discovered evidence upon which they relied would not have compelled a different result at any of the trials. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Our client, a boutique litigation firm established by former BigLaw partners, is seeking to hire a commercial litigation associate to join e...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C.Prominent mid Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office locations seeks a senior attorney with commercial real estate ...
ATTORNEYS WANTED ROCKLAND/BERGEN COUNTYKantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C. Expanding and established multi-practice, mul...
