Editor’s Note: This is the fifth part of Leonard Deutchman’s ongoing series on the evolving treatment of electronic discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It was originally scheduled to appear in last week’s edition of Pennsylvania Law Weekly, but was omitted due to an editor’s oversight. We regret any inconvenience.
In the last several articles I have addressed how attorneys can master the technical and legal requirements of electronic discovery production mandated by the recent changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The rules require litigants to meet and confer early to address issues relating to the disclosure and production of electronically stored information (ESI), and since preparing for the “meet and confer” enables evaluation of how well-understood a case’s e-discovery issues, I have taken it as a model.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
