Public policy forbids interviewing jurors after the verdict to obtain ex parte statements regarding what took place in the jury room. The court denied defendant's motion to set aside the verdict and grant him a new trial.
November 16, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Szakal, PICS Case No. 09-1880 (C.P. Washington Oct. 21, 2009) O’Dell Seneca, J. (9 pages).
Public policy forbids interviewing jurors after the verdict to obtain ex parte statements regarding what took place in the jury room. The court denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and grant him a new trial.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FL INVITES YOUR INTEREST FOR THE POSITION OF CITY ATTORNEYWelcome to the City of Fort Lauderdale. Click on the ...
McCarter & English, LLP seeks an associate for an in-person position in McCarter s Washington DC office. McCarter s energy transactiona...
TIRED OF LAW? MOTIVATED REAL ESTATE AGENTS FOR F/T POSITION WITH TOP RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE TEAM AT BROWN HARRIS STEVENS RESIDENTIAL SALE...
