A Delaware County trial judge properly precluded from trial the hearsay testimony of an unidentified Toys ‘R’ Us employee in part because he doubted the plaintiff’s credibility, a state appeals court has ruled.
In Harris v. Toys ‘R’ Us Inc., PICS Case No. 05-1278 (Pa. Super. Aug. 3, 2005) Lally-Green, J. (16 pages), a three-judge panel of the Superior Court agreed with the trial judge that the alleged hearsay statement didn’t constitute an admission by an employee of the defendant, Toys ‘R’ Us.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
