Given all the negative publicity surrounding pay raises over the past year for public officials, you might think the state Supreme Court would be tired of the issue.
But less than two weeks after the justices heard oral arguments in a trio of cases stemming from the 2005 legislative/judicial pay raise that was later taken away, the high court has agreed to hear the appeal of an Allegheny County judge and former district attorney lost a bid to increase his monthly retirement allowance under state legislation that went into effect nearly two years after he retired as the county’s top prosecutor.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
